Fix mobile differentials search layout and FAB behavior#886
Conversation
…-differential-search Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
overflow-x-hidden on the results canvas forced overflow-y:auto under the flex height cap, nesting a scrollport that left #main-content at scrollTop 0 and broke the mobile compare FAB scroll regression. Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
|
This pull request has been ignored for the connected project Preview Branches by Supabase. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 21 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe mobile differentials compare action now uses a fixed, styled FAB with selected and empty states. Results layout and initial selection synchronization were updated, and mobile regression tests now cover clipped overflow, page scrolling, and dock-relative FAB positioning. ChangesMobile differentials compare
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels: Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
…ntials-fab-1ae0 Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
…ntials-fab-1ae0 Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
…ntials-fab-1ae0 Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary
Verification
npm run test -- --run tests/mobile-interaction-regressions.test.ts(pass)Risk and rollout
Clinical Governance Preflight
Clinical KB Database(sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy)Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes