Skip to content

chore(release): merge release branch to main (proposal for libdd-telemetry (#1999))#2003

Merged
iunanua merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/libdd-telemetry/20260515-145515
May 18, 2026
Merged

chore(release): merge release branch to main (proposal for libdd-telemetry (#1999))#2003
iunanua merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/libdd-telemetry/20260515-145515

Conversation

@dd-octo-sts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 18, 2026

This PR merges the release branch to main

@dd-octo-sts @github-actions @iunanua
chore(release): proposal for libdd-telemetry (#1999)
415f6ca 
# Release proposal for libdd-telemetry and its dependencies

This PR contains version bumps based on public API changes and commits
since last release.

## libdd-capabilities
**Next version:** `2.0.0`
**Semver bump:** `major`
**Tag:** `libdd-capabilities-v2.0.0`

### Commits

- feat(capablities)!: sleep & spawn capabilities (#1873)

## libdd-common
**Next version:** `4.1.0`
**Semver bump:** `minor`
**Tag:** `libdd-common-v4.1.0`

### Commits

- refactor(sampling): move the sampling logic from dd-trace-rs
[APMSP-2946] (#1927)
- feat!: added regex-lite feature (#1939)
- fix(libdd-common): crashes caused by `getenv` while retrieving AAS env
vars (#1930)

## libdd-capabilities-impl
**Next version:** `2.0.0`
**Semver bump:** `major`
**Tag:** `libdd-capabilities-impl-v2.0.0`

### Commits

- feat(capablities)!: sleep & spawn capabilities (#1873)

## libdd-shared-runtime
**Next version:** `1.0.0`
**Semver bump:** `major`
**Tag:** `libdd-shared-runtime-v1.0.0`

**Warning:** this is an initial release. Please verify that the version
and commits included are correct.


## libdd-telemetry
**Next version:** `5.0.0`
**Semver bump:** `major`
**Tag:** `libdd-telemetry-v5.0.0`

### ⚠️ major bump forced due to:

- `libdd-common`: ^3.0.2 → ^4.0.0

### Commits

- fix(libdd-telemetry): restore previous Cargo.toml version (#1993)
- feat(capablities)!: sleep & spawn capabilities (#1873)
- fix(telemetry): avoid trigger loop in telemetry worker (#1950)
- feat(telemetry)!: include dependencies and integrations in
app-extended-heartbeat (#1962)
- fix(crypto): gate libdd-common TLS features in remaining internal
crates + add CI guard (#1943)
- fix(telemetry): schedule ExtendedHeartbeat on worker start (#1910)
- fix(telemetry): skip sending empty payloads (#1894)
- feat(sidecar): wire telemetry_extended_heartbeat_interval through
SessionConfig (#1882)
- chore(telemetry): add session id support (#1817)
- ci(libdd-shared-runtime): downgrade version so publish workflow
succeeds (#1870)
- feat(runtime)!: add shared runtime (#1602)
- perf(sidecar)!: Batch ack sending & consumption (#1835)
- fix(telemetry): wire up DD_TELEMETRY_EXTENDED_HEARTBEAT_INTERVAL to
scheduler (#1824)
- feat(capabilities)!: trait architecture http (#1555)
- chore(telemetry): use weaker mem ordering for SEQ_ID (#1749)


[APMSP-2946]:
https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-2946?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 18, 2026 •
edited
Loading

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 79 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 datadog-ffe - 1 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:116:1
    │
116 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      └── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
          └── datadog-ffe v1.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 datadog-sidecar - 6 error(s)

Show output 
error[unmaintained]: Bincode is unmaintained
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:37:1
   │
37 │ bincode 1.3.3 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unmaintained advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Due to a doxxing and harassment incident, the bincode team has taken the decision to cease development permanently.
     
     The team considers version 1.3.3 a complete version of bincode that is not in need of any updates.
     
     ## Alternatives to consider
     
     * [wincode](https://crates.io/crates/wincode)
     * [postcard](https://crates.io/crates/postcard)
     * [bitcode](https://crates.io/crates/bitcode)
     * [rkyv](https://crates.io/crates/rkyv)
   ├ Announcement: https://git.sr.ht/~stygianentity/bincode/tree/v3.0/item/README.md
   ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
   ├ bincode v1.3.3
     ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
     │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
     └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:288:1
    │
288 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
      │   │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
      │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
      │   │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
      │   │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.0
              ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
              ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.0 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:314:1
    │
314 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:314:1
    │
314 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:314:1
    │
314 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:369:1
    │
369 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
      │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
                  ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
                  │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
                  │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                  └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-capabilities-impl - 4 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:64:1
   │
64 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
         └── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:75:1
   │
75 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
   ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
     
     Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
     
     Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
     
     This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     └── rustls v0.23.37
         ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
         │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
         │       └── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
         ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
         └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
             ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
             └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:75:1
   │
75 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
   ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
     
     This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
     This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
     
     Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
     
     This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     └── rustls v0.23.37
         ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
         │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
         │       └── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
         ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
         └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
             ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
             └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:75:1
   │
75 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
   ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
     or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
     `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
     
     This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
     
     Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
     
     Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     └── rustls v0.23.37
         ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
         │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
         │       └── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
         ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
         └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
             ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
             └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-capabilities - ✅ No issues

📦 libdd-common - 6 error(s)

Show output 
error[vulnerability]: NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation enters unbounded loop on cross-zone responses
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:64:1
   │
64 │ hickory-proto 0.25.2 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0118
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0118
   ├ The NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation in `hickory-proto`'s
     `DnssecDnsHandle` walks from the QNAME up to the SOA owner name, building a
     list of candidate encloser names. The iterator used assumes the
     QNAME is a descendant of the SOA owner, terminating only when the current
     candidate equals the SOA name. When the SOA in a response's authority section
     is not an ancestor of the QNAME, the loop stalls at the DNS root and never
     terminates, repeatedly calling `Name::base_name()` and pushing newly allocated
     `Name` and hashed-name entries into the candidate `Vec`.
     
     The bug is reachable by any caller of `DnssecDnsHandle` — including the
     resolver, recursor, and client — when built with the `dnssec-ring` or
     `dnssec-aws-lc-rs` feature and configured to perform DNSSEC validation. It is
     triggered while validating a NoData or NXDomain response whose authority
     section contains an SOA record from a zone other than an ancestor of the
     QNAME, on a code path that requires NSEC3 closest-encloser proof. In practice
     this can be reached through an insecure CNAME chain that crosses zone
     boundaries into a DNSSEC-signed zone returning NoData, but the minimum
     condition is just a mismatched SOA owner on a response requiring NSEC3
     validation.
     
     A `debug_assert_ne!(name, Name::root())` guards the loop body, so debug builds
     abort with a panic on the first iteration past the root. Release builds
     compile the assertion out and run the loop unbounded, allocating until the
     process exhausts available memory (OOM). A reachable upstream attacker who
     can return such a response can therefore crash a debug-built validator or
     exhaust memory on a release-built one.
     
     The affected code was migrated from `hickory-proto` to `hickory-net` as part of
     the 0.26.0 release. The `hickory-proto` 0.26.x release no longer offers
     `DnssecDnsHandle` and so we recommend all affected users update to `hickory-net`
     0.26.1 when the implementation of that type is required.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/security/advisories/GHSA-3v94-mw7p-v465
   ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
   ├ hickory-proto v0.25.2
     └── hickory-resolver v0.25.2
         └── reqwest v0.13.2
             └── libdd-common v4.1.0

error[vulnerability]: CPU exhaustion during message encoding due to O(n²) name compression
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:64:1
   │
64 │ hickory-proto 0.25.2 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0119
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0119
   ├ During message encoding, `hickory-proto`'s `BinEncoder` stores pointers to
     labels that are candidates for name compression in a `Vec<(usize, Vec<u8>)>`.
     The name compression logic then searches for matches with a linear scan.
     
     A malicious message with many records can both introduce many candidate labels,
     and invoke this linear scan many times. This can amplify CPU exhaustion in DoS
     attacks.
     
     This is similar to
     [CVE-2024-8508](https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2024-8508.txt).
     
     We recommend all affected users update to `hickory-proto` 0.26.1 for the fix.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/security/advisories/GHSA-q2qq-hmj6-3wpp
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.26.1 (try `cargo update -p hickory-proto`)
   ├ hickory-proto v0.25.2
     └── hickory-resolver v0.25.2
         └── reqwest v0.13.2
             └── libdd-common v4.1.0

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:127:1
    │
127 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      └── libdd-common v4.1.0

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:148:1
    │
148 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2
      │   │       └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │       └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:148:1
    │
148 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2
      │   │       └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │       └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:148:1
    │
148 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2
      │   │       └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │       └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-crashtracker - 4 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:200:1
    │
200 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
      │   │           └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
      └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:215:1
    │
215 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │           └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:215:1
    │
215 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │           └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:215:1
    │
215 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │           └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-data-pipeline-ffi - 5 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:220:1
    │
220 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
      │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.0
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.0 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:244:1
    │
244 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:244:1
    │
244 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:244:1
    │
244 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:285:1
    │
285 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
                  └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 5 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:212:1
    │
212 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   ...*[Comment body truncated]*

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 18, 2026

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 79 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 datadog-ffe - 1 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:116:1
    │
116 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      └── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
          └── datadog-ffe v1.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 datadog-sidecar - 6 error(s)

Show output 
error[unmaintained]: Bincode is unmaintained
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:37:1
   │
37 │ bincode 1.3.3 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unmaintained advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Due to a doxxing and harassment incident, the bincode team has taken the decision to cease development permanently.
     
     The team considers version 1.3.3 a complete version of bincode that is not in need of any updates.
     
     ## Alternatives to consider
     
     * [wincode](https://crates.io/crates/wincode)
     * [postcard](https://crates.io/crates/postcard)
     * [bitcode](https://crates.io/crates/bitcode)
     * [rkyv](https://crates.io/crates/rkyv)
   ├ Announcement: https://git.sr.ht/~stygianentity/bincode/tree/v3.0/item/README.md
   ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
   ├ bincode v1.3.3
     ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
     │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
     └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:288:1
    │
288 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
      │   │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
      │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
      │   │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
      │   │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.0
              ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
              ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.0 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:314:1
    │
314 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:314:1
    │
314 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:314:1
    │
314 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:369:1
    │
369 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
      │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   └── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
                  ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
                  │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
                  │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
                  └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-capabilities-impl - 4 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:64:1
   │
64 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
         └── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:75:1
   │
75 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
   ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
     
     Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
     
     Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
     
     This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     └── rustls v0.23.37
         ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
         │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
         │       └── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
         ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
         └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
             ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
             └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:75:1
   │
75 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
   ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
     
     This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
     This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
     
     Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
     
     This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     └── rustls v0.23.37
         ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
         │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
         │       └── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
         ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
         └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
             ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
             └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:75:1
   │
75 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
   ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
     or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
     `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
     
     This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
     
     Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
     
     Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     └── rustls v0.23.37
         ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
         │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
         │       └── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
         ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
         └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
             ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
             └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-capabilities - ✅ No issues

📦 libdd-common - 6 error(s)

Show output 
error[vulnerability]: NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation enters unbounded loop on cross-zone responses
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:64:1
   │
64 │ hickory-proto 0.25.2 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0118
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0118
   ├ The NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation in `hickory-proto`'s
     `DnssecDnsHandle` walks from the QNAME up to the SOA owner name, building a
     list of candidate encloser names. The iterator used assumes the
     QNAME is a descendant of the SOA owner, terminating only when the current
     candidate equals the SOA name. When the SOA in a response's authority section
     is not an ancestor of the QNAME, the loop stalls at the DNS root and never
     terminates, repeatedly calling `Name::base_name()` and pushing newly allocated
     `Name` and hashed-name entries into the candidate `Vec`.
     
     The bug is reachable by any caller of `DnssecDnsHandle` — including the
     resolver, recursor, and client — when built with the `dnssec-ring` or
     `dnssec-aws-lc-rs` feature and configured to perform DNSSEC validation. It is
     triggered while validating a NoData or NXDomain response whose authority
     section contains an SOA record from a zone other than an ancestor of the
     QNAME, on a code path that requires NSEC3 closest-encloser proof. In practice
     this can be reached through an insecure CNAME chain that crosses zone
     boundaries into a DNSSEC-signed zone returning NoData, but the minimum
     condition is just a mismatched SOA owner on a response requiring NSEC3
     validation.
     
     A `debug_assert_ne!(name, Name::root())` guards the loop body, so debug builds
     abort with a panic on the first iteration past the root. Release builds
     compile the assertion out and run the loop unbounded, allocating until the
     process exhausts available memory (OOM). A reachable upstream attacker who
     can return such a response can therefore crash a debug-built validator or
     exhaust memory on a release-built one.
     
     The affected code was migrated from `hickory-proto` to `hickory-net` as part of
     the 0.26.0 release. The `hickory-proto` 0.26.x release no longer offers
     `DnssecDnsHandle` and so we recommend all affected users update to `hickory-net`
     0.26.1 when the implementation of that type is required.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/security/advisories/GHSA-3v94-mw7p-v465
   ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
   ├ hickory-proto v0.25.2
     └── hickory-resolver v0.25.2
         └── reqwest v0.13.2
             └── libdd-common v4.1.0

error[vulnerability]: CPU exhaustion during message encoding due to O(n²) name compression
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:64:1
   │
64 │ hickory-proto 0.25.2 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0119
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0119
   ├ During message encoding, `hickory-proto`'s `BinEncoder` stores pointers to
     labels that are candidates for name compression in a `Vec<(usize, Vec<u8>)>`.
     The name compression logic then searches for matches with a linear scan.
     
     A malicious message with many records can both introduce many candidate labels,
     and invoke this linear scan many times. This can amplify CPU exhaustion in DoS
     attacks.
     
     This is similar to
     [CVE-2024-8508](https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2024-8508.txt).
     
     We recommend all affected users update to `hickory-proto` 0.26.1 for the fix.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/security/advisories/GHSA-q2qq-hmj6-3wpp
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.26.1 (try `cargo update -p hickory-proto`)
   ├ hickory-proto v0.25.2
     └── hickory-resolver v0.25.2
         └── reqwest v0.13.2
             └── libdd-common v4.1.0

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:127:1
    │
127 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      └── libdd-common v4.1.0

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:148:1
    │
148 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2
      │   │       └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │       └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:148:1
    │
148 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2
      │   │       └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │       └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:148:1
    │
148 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2
      │   │       └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
      │       └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-crashtracker - 4 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:200:1
    │
200 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
      │   │           └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
      └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:215:1
    │
215 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │           └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:215:1
    │
215 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │           └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:215:1
    │
215 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │           └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-data-pipeline-ffi - 5 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:220:1
    │
220 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
      │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.0
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.0 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:244:1
    │
244 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:244:1
    │
244 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:244:1
    │
244 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v33.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:285:1
    │
285 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
                  └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v33.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 5 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:212:1
    │
212 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   ...*[Comment body truncated]*

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 18, 2026 •
edited
Loading

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 10978 documentation warning(s) found

📦 datadog-ffe - 197 warning(s)

📦 datadog-sidecar - 2554 warning(s)

📦 libdd-capabilities-impl - 181 warning(s)

📦 libdd-capabilities - 12 warning(s)

📦 libdd-common - 166 warning(s)

📦 libdd-crashtracker - 1079 warning(s)

📦 libdd-data-pipeline-ffi - 1143 warning(s)

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 1032 warning(s)

📦 libdd-dogstatsd-client - 166 warning(s)

📦 libdd-http-client - ✅ No warnings

📦 libdd-profiling - 648 warning(s)

📦 libdd-sampling - 178 warning(s)

📦 libdd-shared-runtime-ffi - 192 warning(s)

📦 libdd-shared-runtime - 185 warning(s)

📦 libdd-telemetry - 505 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-obfuscation - 656 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-stats - 695 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-utils - 568 warning(s)

📦 libdd-tracer-flare - 821 warning(s)

Updated: 2026-05-18 08:27:31 UTC | Commit: 54e7cf9 | missing-docs job results

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented May 18, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.84%. Comparing base (cb36645) to head (415f6ca).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2003      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.71%   72.84%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         452      452              
  Lines       74886    74893       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits        54450    54555     +105     
+ Misses      20436    20338      -98
Components Coverage Δ
libdd-crashtracker 65.29% <ø> (ø)
libdd-crashtracker-ffi 37.56% <ø> (ø)
libdd-alloc 98.77% <ø> (ø)
libdd-data-pipeline 86.22% <ø> (+0.22%) ⬆️
libdd-data-pipeline-ffi 72.32% <ø> (+1.28%) ⬆️
libdd-common 79.81% <ø> (ø)
libdd-common-ffi 74.41% <ø> (ø)
libdd-telemetry 73.34% <ø> (ø)
libdd-telemetry-ffi 31.36% <ø> (ø)
libdd-dogstatsd-client 82.64% <ø> (ø)
datadog-ipc 76.22% <ø> (ø)
libdd-profiling 81.58% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
libdd-profiling-ffi 64.51% <ø> (ø)
libdd-sampling 97.46% <ø> (ø)
datadog-sidecar 30.28% <ø> (+1.30%) ⬆️
datdog-sidecar-ffi 15.50% <ø> (+6.42%) ⬆️
spawn-worker 48.86% <ø> (ø)
libdd-tinybytes 93.16% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-normalization 81.71% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-obfuscation 87.39% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-protobuf 68.25% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-utils 89.59% <ø> (ø)
libdd-tracer-flare 86.88% <ø> (ø)
libdd-log 74.83% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@datadog-official
Copy link
Copy Markdown

datadog-official Bot commented May 18, 2026 •
edited by datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot
Loading

Tests

🎉 All green!

❄️ No new flaky tests detected
🧪 All tests passed

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 72.84% (+0.11%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 415f6ca | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@iunanua iunanua marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2026 08:57
@iunanua iunanua requested review from a team as code owners May 18, 2026 08:57
@iunanua iunanua requested review from dd-oleksii and greghuels and removed request for a team May 18, 2026 08:57
@iunanua iunanua merged commit 5d54b4d into main May 18, 2026
106 checks passed
@iunanua iunanua deleted the release/libdd-telemetry/20260515-145515 branch May 18, 2026 09:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@hoolioh hoolioh hoolioh approved these changes

@greghuels greghuels Awaiting requested review from greghuels greghuels is a code owner automatically assigned from DataDog/feature-flagging-and-experimentation-sdk

@dd-oleksii dd-oleksii Awaiting requested review from dd-oleksii dd-oleksii is a code owner automatically assigned from DataDog/feature-flagging-and-experimentation-sdk

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

common crashtracker data-pipeline mini-agent sampling sidecar skip-changelog-check skip-metadata-check telemetry

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@codecov-commenter @hoolioh @iunanua