Skip to content

chore(release): proposal for libdd-sampling#2004

Merged
iunanua merged 8 commits into
release/libdd-sampling/20260518-101340from
release-proposal/libdd-sampling/20260518-101340
May 18, 2026
Merged

chore(release): proposal for libdd-sampling#2004
iunanua merged 8 commits into
release/libdd-sampling/20260518-101340from
release-proposal/libdd-sampling/20260518-101340

Conversation

@dd-octo-sts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 18, 2026 •
edited by atlassian Bot
Loading

Release proposal for libdd-sampling and its dependencies

This PR contains version bumps based on public API changes and commits since last release.

libdd-tinybytes

Next version: 1.1.1
Semver bump: patch
Tag: libdd-tinybytes-v1.1.1

Commits

libdd-trace-protobuf

Next version: 3.0.2
Semver bump: patch
Tag: libdd-trace-protobuf-v3.0.2

Commits

libdd-trace-utils

Next version: 4.0.0
Semver bump: major
Tag: libdd-trace-utils-v4.0.0

⚠️ major bump forced due to:

  • libdd-common: ^3.0.2 → ^4.1.0

Commits

libdd-sampling

Next version: 1.0.0
Semver bump: major
Tag: libdd-sampling-v1.0.0

Warning: this is an initial release. Please verify that the version and commits included are correct.

github-actions Bot and others added 8 commits May 18, 2026 10:18
@github-actions @iunanua
chore: Release
1d03c16 
Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions @iunanua
chore: Release
76df1e4 
Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions @iunanua
chore: Release
08fd937 
Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions @iunanua
chore: Release
27eca32 
Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions @iunanua
chore(release): update CHANGELOG.md for libdd-tinybytes
9957463 
Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions @iunanua
chore(release): update CHANGELOG.md for libdd-trace-protobuf
59091a0 
Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions @iunanua
chore(release): update CHANGELOG.md for libdd-trace-utils
b551125 
Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions @iunanua
chore(release): update CHANGELOG.md for libdd-sampling
85d9eda 
Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 18, 2026 •
edited
Loading

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 4346 documentation warning(s) found

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 1032 warning(s)

📦 libdd-library-config - 150 warning(s)

📦 libdd-sampling - 178 warning(s)

📦 libdd-tinybytes - 7 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-normalization - 127 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-obfuscation - 656 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-protobuf - 112 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-stats - 695 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-utils - 568 warning(s)

📦 libdd-tracer-flare - 821 warning(s)

Updated: 2026-05-18 10:21:15 UTC | Commit: 718304e | missing-docs job results

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 18, 2026 •
edited
Loading

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 28 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 5 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:212:1
    │
212 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:236:1
    │
236 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:236:1
    │
236 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:236:1
    │
236 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:276:1
    │
276 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-library-config - 1 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:47:1
   │
47 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── libdd-library-config v1.1.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-sampling - 4 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:94:1
   │
94 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
         └── (dev) libdd-sampling v1.0.0

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:107:1
    │
107 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       └── (dev) libdd-sampling v1.0.0
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:107:1
    │
107 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       └── (dev) libdd-sampling v1.0.0
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:107:1
    │
107 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       └── (dev) libdd-sampling v1.0.0
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-tinybytes - ✅ No issues

📦 libdd-trace-normalization - 1 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:51:1
   │
51 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-trace-obfuscation - 4 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:182:1
    │
182 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:206:1
    │
206 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:206:1
    │
206 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:206:1
    │
206 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-trace-protobuf - ✅ No issues

📦 libdd-trace-stats - 4 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:189:1
    │
189 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:213:1
    │
213 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:213:1
    │
213 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:213:1
    │
213 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-trace-utils - 4 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:177:1
    │
177 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:199:1
    │
199 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:199:1
    │
199 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:199:1
    │
199 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-tracer-flare - 5 error(s)

Show output 
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:194:1
    │
194 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
      │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
      │   │       ├── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:216:1
    │
216 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:216:1
    │
216 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:216:1
    │
216 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:256:1
    │
256 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

Updated: 2026-05-18 10:22:46 UTC | Commit: 718304e | dependency-check job results

@iunanua iunanua marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2026 10:34
@iunanua iunanua requested review from a team as code owners May 18, 2026 10:34
@iunanua iunanua requested review from vpellan and removed request for a team May 18, 2026 10:34
@datadog-datadog-prod-us1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot commented May 18, 2026

Tests

🎉 All green!

❄️ No new flaky tests detected
🧪 All tests passed

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 72.73% (-0.10%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 85d9eda | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented May 18, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.73%. Comparing base (5d54b4d) to head (85d9eda).

Additional details and impacted files 
@@                            Coverage Diff                             @@
##           release/libdd-sampling/20260518-101340    #2004      +/-   ##
==========================================================================
- Coverage                                   72.83%   72.73%   -0.11%     
==========================================================================
  Files                                         452      452              
  Lines                                       74893    74893              
==========================================================================
- Hits                                        54550    54473      -77     
- Misses                                      20343    20420      +77
Components Coverage Δ
libdd-crashtracker 65.28% <ø> (ø)
libdd-crashtracker-ffi 37.56% <ø> (ø)
libdd-alloc 98.77% <ø> (ø)
libdd-data-pipeline 86.00% <ø> (-0.23%) ⬇️
libdd-data-pipeline-ffi 71.04% <ø> (-1.29%) ⬇️
libdd-common 79.81% <ø> (ø)
libdd-common-ffi 74.41% <ø> (ø)
libdd-telemetry 73.34% <ø> (ø)
libdd-telemetry-ffi 31.36% <ø> (ø)
libdd-dogstatsd-client 82.64% <ø> (ø)
datadog-ipc 76.22% <ø> (ø)
libdd-profiling 81.60% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
libdd-profiling-ffi 64.51% <ø> (ø)
libdd-sampling 97.46% <ø> (ø)
datadog-sidecar 29.21% <ø> (-1.07%) ⬇️
datdog-sidecar-ffi 10.26% <ø> (-5.25%) ⬇️
spawn-worker 48.86% <ø> (ø)
libdd-tinybytes 93.16% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-normalization 81.71% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-obfuscation 87.39% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-protobuf 68.25% <ø> (ø)
libdd-trace-utils 89.59% <ø> (ø)
libdd-tracer-flare 86.88% <ø> (ø)
libdd-log 74.83% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@dd-octo-sts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 18, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

aarch64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 81.83 MB 81.83 MB +0% (+1.09 KB) 👌
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 7.57 MB 7.57 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 98.03 MB 98.03 MB -0% (-1.12 KB) 👌
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 10.01 MB 10.01 MB -0% (-272 B) 👌
libdatadog-x64-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 24.50 MB 24.48 MB --.07% (-20.00 KB) 💪
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 79.87 KB 79.87 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 180.27 MB 180.23 MB --.02% (-48.00 KB) 💪
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 914.04 MB 914.05 MB +0% (+11.82 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 7.73 MB 7.73 MB +.01% (+1.50 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 79.87 KB 79.87 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 23.16 MB 23.16 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 45.35 MB 45.36 MB +.01% (+5.51 KB) 🔍
libdatadog-x86-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 21.08 MB 21.10 MB +.08% (+18.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 81.11 KB 81.11 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 184.36 MB 184.43 MB +.03% (+72.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 900.34 MB 900.32 MB -0% (-18.48 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 5.99 MB 5.99 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 81.11 KB 81.11 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 24.80 MB 24.80 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 42.85 MB 42.85 MB +0% (+1.65 KB) 👌
x86_64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 72.94 MB 72.93 MB -0% (-2.48 KB) 👌
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 8.42 MB 8.42 MB --.04% (-4.00 KB) 💪
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 90.71 MB 90.71 MB +0% (+3.54 KB) 👌
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 10.06 MB 10.06 MB +0% (+64 B) 👌

@iunanua iunanua merged commit 53f9879 into release/libdd-sampling/20260518-101340 May 18, 2026
115 of 121 checks passed
@iunanua iunanua deleted the release-proposal/libdd-sampling/20260518-101340 branch May 18, 2026 11:26
iunanua added a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2026
@dd-octo-sts @github-actions @iunanua
chore(release): merge release branch to main (proposal for libdd-samp…
fef1801 
…ling (#2004)) (#2006)

This PR merges the release branch to main

Co-authored-by: dd-octo-sts[bot] <200755185+dd-octo-sts[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@vpellan vpellan Awaiting requested review from vpellan vpellan was automatically assigned from DataDog/apm-sdk-capabilities-rust

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

data-pipeline mini-agent release-proposal This is a release proposal PR sampling skip-changelog-check skip-metadata-check skip-pr-title-semver-check

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@codecov-commenter @iunanua