chore(release): merge release branch to main (proposal for libdd-sampling (#2004)) by dd-octo-sts[bot] · Pull Request #2006 · DataDog/libdatadog

dd-octo-sts · 2026-05-18T11:40:33Z

This PR merges the release branch to main

# Release proposal for libdd-sampling and its dependencies This PR contains version bumps based on public API changes and commits since last release. ## libdd-tinybytes **Next version:** `1.1.1` **Semver bump:** `patch` **Tag:** `libdd-tinybytes-v1.1.1` ### Commits - perf: pre-compute string messagepack encoding (#1948) ## libdd-trace-protobuf **Next version:** `3.0.2` **Semver bump:** `patch` **Tag:** `libdd-trace-protobuf-v3.0.2` ### Commits - feat(obfuscation)!: feature parity on span obfuscation [APMSP-2671] (#1788) ## libdd-trace-utils **Next version:** `4.0.0` **Semver bump:** `major` **Tag:** `libdd-trace-utils-v4.0.0` ### ⚠️ major bump forced due to: - `libdd-common`: ^3.0.2 → ^4.1.0 ### Commits - feat(trace-utils)!: search all spans to populate tracer payload fields (#1954) - perf: pre-compute string messagepack encoding (#1948) - feat(capablities)!: sleep & spawn capabilities (#1873) - feat(libdd-trace-utils): check for empty value in header datadog-client-computed-stats (#1900) - chore(benchmarks): add allocation size tracking allocator (#1905) - fix(crypto): gate libdd-common TLS features in obfuscation and capabilities-impl (#1872) - fix(libdd-traceutils): Update cloud environment detection logic for Serverless [SVLS-8799] (#1857) - fix(spawn_worker): defer trampoline self-deletion to avoid Valgrind false positive (#1844) - feat(runtime)!: add shared runtime (#1602) - ci: compilation of libdd-data-pipeline to wasm32 (#1830) - feat(capabilities)!: trait architecture http (#1555) - feat(trace-export): map DD span resource to OTLP resource.name attribute (#1811) - feat(otel): add support for OTLP trace export (#1641) ## libdd-sampling **Next version:** `1.0.0` **Semver bump:** `major` **Tag:** `libdd-sampling-v1.0.0` **Warning:** this is an initial release. Please verify that the version and commits included are correct. [APMSP-2671]: https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-2671?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ [SVLS-8799]: https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/SVLS-8799?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>

github-actions · 2026-05-18T11:42:36Z

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 4346 documentation warning(s) found

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 1032 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-library-config` - 150 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-sampling` - 178 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-tinybytes` - 7 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-normalization` - 127 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-obfuscation` - 656 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-protobuf` - 112 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-stats` - 695 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-utils` - 568 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-tracer-flare` - 821 warning(s)

Updated: 2026-05-18 11:43:04 UTC | Commit: ae500b8 | missing-docs job results

github-actions · 2026-05-18T11:44:09Z

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 28 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 5 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:212:1
    │
212 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:236:1
    │
236 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:236:1
    │
236 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:236:1
    │
236 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:276:1
    │
276 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 `libdd-library-config` - 1 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:47:1
   │
47 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── libdd-library-config v1.1.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 `libdd-sampling` - 4 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:94:1
   │
94 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
         └── (dev) libdd-sampling v1.0.0

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:107:1
    │
107 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       └── (dev) libdd-sampling v1.0.0
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:107:1
    │
107 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       └── (dev) libdd-sampling v1.0.0
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:107:1
    │
107 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       └── (dev) libdd-sampling v1.0.0
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 `libdd-tinybytes` - ✅ No issues

📦 `libdd-trace-normalization` - 1 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:51:1
   │
51 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 `libdd-trace-obfuscation` - 4 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:182:1
    │
182 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:206:1
    │
206 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:206:1
    │
206 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:206:1
    │
206 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 `libdd-trace-protobuf` - ✅ No issues

📦 `libdd-trace-stats` - 4 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:189:1
    │
189 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:213:1
    │
213 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:213:1
    │
213 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:213:1
    │
213 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 `libdd-trace-utils` - 4 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:177:1
    │
177 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:199:1
    │
199 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:199:1
    │
199 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:199:1
    │
199 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 `libdd-tracer-flare` - 5 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:194:1
    │
194 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v4.1.0
      │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
      │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
      │   │       ├── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:216:1
    │
216 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:216:1
    │
216 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:216:1
    │
216 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.1.0
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-utils v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:256:1
    │
256 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

Updated: 2026-05-18 11:44:14 UTC | Commit: ae500b8 | dependency-check job results

codecov-commenter · 2026-05-18T11:57:30Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.73%. Comparing base (5d54b4d) to head (53f9879).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2006      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.83%   72.73%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         452      452              
  Lines       74893    74893              
==========================================
- Hits        54550    54475      -75     
- Misses      20343    20418      +75

Components	Coverage Δ
libdd-crashtracker	`65.31% <ø> (+0.02%)`	⬆️
libdd-crashtracker-ffi	`37.56% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-alloc	`98.77% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-data-pipeline	`86.00% <ø> (-0.23%)`	⬇️
libdd-data-pipeline-ffi	`71.04% <ø> (-1.29%)`	⬇️
libdd-common	`79.81% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-common-ffi	`74.41% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-telemetry	`73.34% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-telemetry-ffi	`31.36% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-dogstatsd-client	`82.64% <ø> (ø)`
datadog-ipc	`76.22% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-profiling	`81.60% <ø> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
libdd-profiling-ffi	`64.51% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-sampling	`97.46% <ø> (ø)`
datadog-sidecar	`29.21% <ø> (-1.07%)`	⬇️
datdog-sidecar-ffi	`10.26% <ø> (-5.25%)`	⬇️
spawn-worker	`48.86% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-tinybytes	`93.16% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-normalization	`81.71% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-obfuscation	`87.39% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-protobuf	`68.25% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-utils	`89.59% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-tracer-flare	`86.88% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-log	`74.83% <ø> (ø)`

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

datadog-official · 2026-05-18T11:58:09Z

🎉 All green!

❄️ No new flaky tests detected
🧪 All tests passed

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 72.74% (-0.10%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: 53f9879 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

paullegranddc

can we hold off until @Aaalibaba42 has ironed all problems with bumping libdatadog in dd-trace-rs?

dd-octo-sts Bot added skip-changelog-check skip-metadata-check labels May 18, 2026

github-actions Bot added mini-agent data-pipeline sampling labels May 18, 2026

iunanua marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2026 12:03

iunanua requested review from a team as code owners May 18, 2026 12:03

iunanua requested review from mabdinur and removed request for a team May 18, 2026 12:03

paullegranddc reviewed May 18, 2026

View reviewed changes

paullegranddc approved these changes May 18, 2026

View reviewed changes

iunanua merged commit fef1801 into main May 18, 2026
88 of 93 checks passed

iunanua deleted the release/libdd-sampling/20260518-101340 branch May 18, 2026 13:42

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

chore(release): merge release branch to main (proposal for libdd-sampling (#2004))#2006

chore(release): merge release branch to main (proposal for libdd-sampling (#2004))#2006
iunanua merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/libdd-sampling/20260518-101340

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 18, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 18, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 18, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov-commenter commented May 18, 2026

Uh oh!

datadog-official Bot commented May 18, 2026

Uh oh!

paullegranddc left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Conversation

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 18, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 18, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

📚 Documentation Check Results

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 1032 warning(s)

📦 libdd-library-config - 150 warning(s)

📦 libdd-sampling - 178 warning(s)

📦 libdd-tinybytes - 7 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-normalization - 127 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-obfuscation - 656 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-protobuf - 112 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-stats - 695 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-utils - 568 warning(s)

📦 libdd-tracer-flare - 821 warning(s)

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 18, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 5 error(s)

📦 libdd-library-config - 1 error(s)

📦 libdd-sampling - 4 error(s)

📦 libdd-tinybytes - ✅ No issues

📦 libdd-trace-normalization - 1 error(s)

📦 libdd-trace-obfuscation - 4 error(s)

📦 libdd-trace-protobuf - ✅ No issues

📦 libdd-trace-stats - 4 error(s)

📦 libdd-trace-utils - 4 error(s)

📦 libdd-tracer-flare - 5 error(s)

Uh oh!

codecov-commenter commented May 18, 2026

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

datadog-official Bot commented May 18, 2026

Uh oh!

paullegranddc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

github-actions Bot commented May 18, 2026 •

edited

Loading

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 1032 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-library-config` - 150 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-sampling` - 178 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-tinybytes` - 7 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-normalization` - 127 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-obfuscation` - 656 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-protobuf` - 112 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-stats` - 695 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-utils` - 568 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-tracer-flare` - 821 warning(s)

github-actions Bot commented May 18, 2026 •

edited

Loading

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 5 error(s)

📦 `libdd-library-config` - 1 error(s)

📦 `libdd-sampling` - 4 error(s)

📦 `libdd-tinybytes` - ✅ No issues

📦 `libdd-trace-normalization` - 1 error(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-obfuscation` - 4 error(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-protobuf` - ✅ No issues

📦 `libdd-trace-stats` - 4 error(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-utils` - 4 error(s)

📦 `libdd-tracer-flare` - 5 error(s)