chore(ci): bump ai-review-prompts to 82c9484 (#73 calibration + #74 caller hygiene) - #1891
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…aller hygiene) Review callers 9cf49d2 -> 82c9484: picks up the week-of-06-29 calibration (#73: severity-deflation mirror rule, fail-closed validate-at-registration, secret-redaction routing) plus the #74 caller-hygiene docs. Validate pin -> same SHA: the caller validator now also covers gemini-*.{yml,yaml} callers (fail-closed guard gap from rocksdb-js#701 review feedback). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
|
Note Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported. |
cb1kenobi
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2026
kriszyp
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2026
v5.1's caller workflow was stuck at the pre-#1790/#1891 version — no explicit id-token/pull-requests permissions block and an older ai-review-prompts pin. GitHub's OIDC->app-token exchange for the review job requires the invoking workflow file to be byte-identical to the one on the repository's default branch (main), so every PR based on v5.1 was failing "review / review" with a 401 workflow validation error, unrelated to the PR's actual diff. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus <noreply@anthropic.com>
kriszyp
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2026
v5.1's caller workflow was stuck at the pre-#1790/#1891 version — no explicit id-token/pull-requests permissions block and an older ai-review-prompts pin. GitHub's OIDC->app-token exchange for the review job requires the invoking workflow file to be byte-identical to the one on the repository's default branch (main), so every PR based on v5.1 was failing "review / review" with a 401 workflow validation error, unrelated to the PR's actual diff. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Review callers 9cf49d2 → 82c9484, validate pin → same SHA (uses + ai-review-prompts-ref in lockstep, all three caller files).
What reviews pick up (#73, week-of-06-29 calibration): the severity-deflation mirror rule (peer-flagged defects can't be talked down with unproven "unreachable"/"no escalation" claims), fail-closed / validate-at-registration on new surfaces, and secret-redaction routing checks. These target the dominant partial class in the last two triage batches.
What validate picks up (#74): the caller validator now covers
gemini-*.{yml,yaml}callers too — closes the shadow-job/mutable-ref guard gap flagged in rocksdb-js#701 review feedback.The
model: claude-sonnet-5canary line and the caller-permissions block are untouched. With prompt-ref tracking live, next Sunday's calibration sweep becomes the first before/after read across9cf49d2→82c9484.Note: this PR edits the caller workflows, so its own review checks fail with the expected anti-tamper guard; clears on merge. Companions: oauth + harper-pro (same bump).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code