Skip to content

docs: use kimi-for-coding with generic override fields in model overrides example - #1294

Merged
wbxl2000 merged 1 commit into
MoonshotAI:changeset-release/mainfrom
wenhua020201-arch:fix/model-overrides-example
Jul 2, 2026
Merged

docs: use kimi-for-coding with generic override fields in model overrides example#1294
wbxl2000 merged 1 commit into
MoonshotAI:changeset-release/mainfrom
wenhua020201-arch:fix/model-overrides-example

Conversation

@wenhua020201-arch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Replace the kimi-k2 example in the model overrides section with kimi-for-coding and use generic fields (max_context_size, display_name) that are guaranteed to work regardless of the model's thinking-effort support.

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 57ed6cb

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1c9fb2a82e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".


### Patch Changes

- [#1285](https://github.com/MoonshotAI/kimi-code/pull/1285) [`c434b4c`](https://github.com/MoonshotAI/kimi-code/commit/c434b4c3e658b686e5f0d0d7d3a2b4cfbfbcaffa) - Cap the output a single foreground shell command may stream so a runaway command can no longer crash the process. A command that produces a very large or unbounded amount of output (e.g. `b3sum --length 18446744073709551615`) previously grew the live-output buffer until Node aborted with a JavaScript heap out-of-memory error; it is now gracefully terminated once its output exceeds 16 MiB, and the result explains how to redirect large output to a file instead. The per-task output ring buffer is also maintained in O(1) per chunk rather than O(n²). Background tasks are unaffected.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Put the foreground-output fix in the CLI release

For the #1285 foreground Bash output cap, this release note is being emitted under @moonshot-ai/agent-core, but that package is private (packages/agent-core/package.json) and the repo’s changeset guide says CLI-visible internal fixes should target @moonshot-ai/kimi-code. Since the new apps/kimi-code 0.22.1 changelog only lists #1290 and #1283, users of the published CLI release get no release note indicating that the OOM-crash fix is included; move this consumed changeset/release note to the CLI package before publishing.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@wenhua020201-arch
wenhua020201-arch force-pushed the fix/model-overrides-example branch from 1c9fb2a to 57ed6cb Compare July 2, 2026 06:01
@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-new Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
pnpm dlx https://pkg.pr.new/@moonshot-ai/kimi-code@57ed6cb
npx https://pkg.pr.new/@moonshot-ai/kimi-code@57ed6cb

commit: 57ed6cb

@wbxl2000
wbxl2000 merged commit 59d0d48 into MoonshotAI:changeset-release/main Jul 2, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants