Add dark/light theme - #4
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughAdds dark/light Theme Support to the design system and expands the Mostro P2P client specification and validation checklists with protocol enrichment, order-state machine details, encryption layering, chat persistence, theme behavior requirements, and refined entity definitions. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@specs/001-mostro-p2p-client/spec.md`:
- Around line 22-29: The spec uses two different admin-cancel state names
("canceledByAdmin" and "admin-canceled") and omits them in FR-043, causing
ambiguity; standardize the canonical name across the document (choose one, e.g.,
"canceledByAdmin"), update every occurrence (including the state machine listing
around pending→... and the references at lines ~310 and ~367), and update FR-043
to reference the chosen canonical state name so UI labels, acceptance tests, and
state-handling logic all use the same identifier.
- Around line 21-29: The two fenced code blocks in
specs/001-mostro-p2p-client/spec.md (the block containing the state diagram
"pending → waitingBuyerInvoice → ..." around lines 21–29 and the block with the
layer descriptions "Layer 1: Rumor ..." around lines 46–52) are missing language
identifiers and trigger MD040; update each opening triple-fence to include a
language identifier such as text (e.g., add the identifier text after the
opening fence) so both fenced blocks include a language and satisfy the markdown
linter.
- Around line 186-190: The acceptance-scenario numbering is duplicated: both the
"Given a user in preferences, When they change the language..." and "Given a
user in wallet settings, When they paste a NWC URI..." lines are numbered "6.";
update the ordered list so numbering is unique and sequential (change the
wallet-settings NWC URI scenario from "6." to "7." and the following "Given a
user has connected relays..." scenario from "7." to "8."), editing the lines
containing those exact scenario texts in spec.md to maintain unambiguous
references.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 27284932-f4cc-4b6f-a516-3c3ed6a0c475
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.specify/DESIGN_SYSTEM.mdspecs/001-mostro-p2p-client/checklists/requirements.mdspecs/001-mostro-p2p-client/spec.md
- Add Mostro Protocol Reference section (15-state machine, NIP-59 layers, action catalog, versioning) - Expand FR-019 into full dark/light theme requirements (FR-019a-f) - Add FR-043-051 (order states, privacy modes, encrypted chat storage, NWC reconnect, Blossom fallback, paymentFailed, silent notifications, diagnostic logging) - Enrich key entities (Identity, Order, Message, Relay, NWC Wallet) - Add architectural constraints to Assumptions (Rust core, NIP-59, key path) - Add 5 new edge cases and 4 new success criteria (SC-019-022) - Resolve 4 clarifications: admin scope, privacy mode toggle, range orders, diagnostics logging - Standardize canceledByAdmin across all references (was admin-canceled) - Add language identifiers to fenced code blocks - Fix duplicate scenario numbering in US7
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@specs/001-mostro-p2p-client/checklists/requirements.md`:
- Line 51: Update the checklist line that currently reads "Full 14-state order
machine documented — Protocol Reference section, FR-043, Order entity" to say
"Full 15-state order machine documented — Protocol Reference section, FR-043,
Order entity" so it matches the Order State Machine defined in
specs/001-mostro-p2p-client/spec.md and FR-043; verify the wording exactly
references "Order State Machine" / "FR-043" to avoid future mismatch.
- Line 80: The summary line "13 user stories, 51 functional requirements, 22
success criteria, 16 edge cases." is incorrect because spec.md actually lists 15
edge cases; either update that line in requirements.md to read "15 edge cases"
or add the missing edge case entry into spec.md so the counts match; locate the
exact string "13 user stories, 51 functional requirements, 22 success criteria,
16 edge cases." in requirements.md and change the number or add the missing
edge-case item in spec.md so both documents are consistent.
- Line 57: The checklist entry "- [x] Rust core + flutter_rust_bridge
architecture — Assumptions section" is an implementation-detail and conflicts
with the "No implementation details" rule; either remove or reword this item to
a higher-level criterion (e.g., "Cross-language architecture documented" or
"Interop approach justified") or move the exact item into a technical-design
checklist; update the requirements.md checklist so the item no longer asserts a
specific implementation (or explicitly relax the rule by adding a clear
exception note) and ensure the checklist header or a nearby comment explains
which approach was taken.
In `@specs/001-mostro-p2p-client/spec.md`:
- Around line 426-428: Remove the stack-specific implementation sentences that
hard-code "v2 uses a Rust core layer bridged to the Flutter UI via
flutter_rust_bridge" and the accompanying "This is an architectural
constraint..." wording from the spec; move those details into an ADR/technical
design doc and replace them with a short non-technical reference like
"Implementation details (e.g., language/runtime, bridging) are documented in the
ADR." Keep protocol-level requirements that belong in the product spec (e.g.,
"NIP-59 three-layer encryption model (Rumor inside Seal inside Gift Wrap)" and
the key derivation requirement "m/44'/1237'/38383'/0/N") but ensure they are
phrased as product constraints, not implementation choices, and add a pointer to
the ADR for architecture and stack decisions.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: d8dd095c-3058-4c14-8f8c-b91d8a6b08b4
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
specs/001-mostro-p2p-client/checklists/requirements.mdspecs/001-mostro-p2p-client/spec.md
- Update order state count from 14 to 15 (canceledByAdmin was missing) - Fix edge case count from 16 to 15 in checklist (matches spec) - Replace stack-specific Rust/Flutter/flutter_rust_bridge references in spec Assumptions with technology-agnostic core/UI layer constraint - Reword checklist architecture entry to remove implementation details - Defer stack decisions to ADR
grunch
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2026
orders.rs — Fix #7: store_trade_key_index before publish Moved store_trade_key_index(&order_id, trade_index) from before the action dispatch to inside the publish-success else branch. A publish failure no longer leaves a stale key mapping. orders.rs — Fix #5: ln_address logged in plain text Replaced ln_address={:?} (which printed the actual address) with ln_address=present/none using if ln_address_ref.is_some(). orders.rs — Fix #4: fixed 30-min deadline regardless of activity Replaced the fixed deadline with a last_activity instant that resets on each matching event. The idle timeout is now 30 minutes of inactivity, not 30 minutes of total uptime. add_lightning_invoice_screen.dart — Fix #2: Lightning Address sent with 1-sat amount _isValid now returns false for @ inputs when _resolvedSats is null. _submit also guards against it and surfaces an error instead of falling through to BigInt.one. trade_detail_screen.dart — Fix #3: OrderStatus.pending mapped to TradeStatus.active Added TradeStatus.loading to the enum and made it the default branch in _mapOrderStatus. Unresolved/initial statuses no longer match the active-trade action button sections.
4 tasks
6 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by CodeRabbit