[MIG][10.0] rating: nothing to do - #1352
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This analysis file is not correct... this field exists also in v10, but other new fields like rating_image or rating_text are not reported. @StefanRijnhart do you have idea why?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah @pedrobaeza you are looking at the analysis of 10.0 so this field should be here. As for rating_image and rating_text in 11.0, these are computed fields and have been traditionally left out of the analysis as they presumably do not need any work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Agh, I have mixed v10 and v11 as we have both. Sorry for the noise.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@cubells you have to set this to True if rating != -1, which is the previous default value when unset.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
EDIT: Sorry, the correct comparison value is != -1
91907ca to
4fb0980
Compare
|
I'm thinking that for having the same data as in v11, you have to put the field |
8dda91e to
9e8a41a
Compare
|
@pedrobaeza |
|
@cubells you have made the contrary. Read again what I wrote. You need 2 queries. |
|
Oops. You are right. |
3 participants
cc @Tecnativa