Skip to content

[10.0][FIX] backport of SerpentCS mass_editing v10 port - #820

Merged
max3903 merged 6 commits into
OCA:10.0from
savoirfairelinux:10.0_serpentcs_backport
May 17, 2017
Merged

[10.0][FIX] backport of SerpentCS mass_editing v10 port#820
max3903 merged 6 commits into
OCA:10.0from
savoirfairelinux:10.0_serpentcs_backport

Conversation

@jbchouinard

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I merged the v10 port of mass_editing by @JayVora-SerpentCS, found here: https://github.com/JayVora-SerpentCS/MassEditing/tree/10.0.

I split the code from the translations to make review easier.

Commit 4614486 fixes issue #806.

@jbchouinard jbchouinard changed the title 10.0 serpentcs backport [10.0][MIG] backport of SerpentCS mass_editing v10 port Apr 24, 2017
@jbchouinard jbchouinard changed the title [10.0][MIG] backport of SerpentCS mass_editing v10 port [10.0][FIX] backport of SerpentCS mass_editing v10 port Apr 24, 2017
@jbchouinard
jbchouinard force-pushed the 10.0_serpentcs_backport branch 3 times, most recently from c07f73c to d4dfde9 Compare April 24, 2017 21:00
@jbchouinard

jbchouinard commented Apr 25, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@JayVora-SerpentCS I was looking at this while merging the code:

domain="[('ttype', 'not in', ['reference', 'function']), ('model_id', 'in', model_list)]"/>

What's the reason for not simply using ('model_id', '=', model_id)?

I dont really understand what model_list is for since it's just set to [model_id] in the onchange on model_id.

EDIT: Nevermind I hadn't looked carefully, it's right there in the code, the parent models are added to model_list, so sometimes it has more than one id.

Comment thread mass_editing/i18n/da.po Outdated
#. module: mass_editing
=======
#: model:ir.model,name:mass_editing.model_ir_model_fields
>>>>>>> c5fd7e3... Made Mass Editing module v10 compatible

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jbchouinard there is an unresolved conflict here.

@sbidoul

sbidoul commented May 4, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Otherwise it works fine.

@ovnicraft

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

is the end of world w/o this module !, is ready to merge ?

@JayVora-SerpentCS

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Should never ne model_list, rather. It was a backport from old version - #598 (comment)

@anhvu-sg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hello, can anyone merge this commit please ?

@jbchouinard
jbchouinard force-pushed the 10.0_serpentcs_backport branch from d4dfde9 to e384fd0 Compare May 16, 2017 14:50
@jbchouinard

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@sbidoul oops fixed that. I grepped and didnt find any more unresolved conflicts

@joaoalf

joaoalf commented May 17, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👍 LGTM

Please someone merge this as soon as possible.

@max3903
max3903 merged commit ed54cfb into OCA:10.0 May 17, 2017
@JayVora-SerpentCS

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This shouldn't have been merged dears! Some edits revert the actual Pr #598 and the old cherry picked commits @pedrobaeza

@ovnicraft

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@JayVora-SerpentCS can you make a new PR ?

@JayVora-SerpentCS

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I guess better to uncommit this one and correct, otherwise we will go in another loop of complexity.

@sbidoul

sbidoul commented May 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We cannot uncommit, only revert. Please do another PR.

@JayVora-SerpentCS

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I meant revert, sorry for the confusion.

jbchouinard added a commit to savoirfairelinux/server-tools that referenced this pull request May 23, 2017
jnegrete pushed a commit to AlceConsorcio/server-tools that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2017
* Made Mass Editing module v10 compatible
* Mass Editing module v10 translations
* Update ir_model_fields.py
* [FIX] mass_editing v10 port openerp->odoo
* [FIX] pep8
* [FIX] remove no-longer supported auto_refresh in view
ljimenezsidoo pushed a commit to PESOL/server-tools that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2018
* Made Mass Editing module v10 compatible
* Mass Editing module v10 translations
* Update ir_model_fields.py
* [FIX] mass_editing v10 port openerp->odoo
* [FIX] pep8
* [FIX] remove no-longer supported auto_refresh in view
holdenrehg pushed a commit to holdenrehg-forks/server-tools that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2018
* Made Mass Editing module v10 compatible
* Mass Editing module v10 translations
* Update ir_model_fields.py
* [FIX] mass_editing v10 port openerp->odoo
* [FIX] pep8
* [FIX] remove no-longer supported auto_refresh in view
holdenrehg pushed a commit to holdenrehg-forks/server-tools that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2018
* Made Mass Editing module v10 compatible
* Mass Editing module v10 translations
* Update ir_model_fields.py
* [FIX] mass_editing v10 port openerp->odoo
* [FIX] pep8
* [FIX] remove no-longer supported auto_refresh in view
holdenrehg pushed a commit to holdenrehg-forks/server-tools that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2018
* Made Mass Editing module v10 compatible
* Mass Editing module v10 translations
* Update ir_model_fields.py
* [FIX] mass_editing v10 port openerp->odoo
* [FIX] pep8
* [FIX] remove no-longer supported auto_refresh in view
SiesslPhillip pushed a commit to grueneerde/OCA-server-tools that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
…obaeza-bump-minor

Syncing from upstream OCA/server-tools (14.0-ocabot-merge-pr-2198-by-pedrobaeza-bump-minor)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants