Skip to content

Documentation: Remove CONFIG_ARMV7M_USEBASEPRI from code base#15102

Merged
hartmannathan merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
xiaoxiang781216:zero
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

Documentation: Remove CONFIG_ARMV7M_USEBASEPRI from code base#15102
hartmannathan merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
xiaoxiang781216:zero

Conversation

@xiaoxiang781216

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

since the basepri is always used without any configuration

Impact

continue clean up from #15073

Testing

ci

since the basepri is always used without any configuraion

Signed-off-by: Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang@xiaomi.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot added Area: Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Size: S The size of the change in this PR is small labels Dec 10, 2024
@nuttxpr

nuttxpr commented Dec 10, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]

No, this PR does not appear to meet the NuttX requirements based on the provided information. The summary is far too vague. It needs to clearly state what is being changed and why. "since the basepri is always used without any configuration" doesn't tell us anything about the actual change.

The impact section is also insufficient. It references a previous PR but doesn't explain the impact of this PR. All the "NO/YES" questions should be answered explicitly with explanations where necessary.

Finally, "ci" for testing is not acceptable. The requirements ask for specific build host and target information, as well as before/after testing logs. Simply saying "ci" doesn't demonstrate that the changes have been adequately tested. The reviewer needs to see the evidence.

@xiaoxiang781216

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Fix the concern from #15100.

@xiaoxiang781216 xiaoxiang781216 linked an issue Dec 10, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
1 task

@hartmannathan hartmannathan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change is correct. BASEPRI is always used in ARM targets that have it. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Area: Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Size: S The size of the change in this PR is small

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] PR-15073 PR-15086 broke High Priority Zero Latency Interrupts

3 participants