[ZEPPELIN-1069]Ignore implicit interpreter when user enter wrong interpreter name#1248
[ZEPPELIN-1069]Ignore implicit interpreter when user enter wrong interpreter name#1248mwkang wants to merge 10 commits into
Conversation
|
@jongyoul Can you review this PR? |
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| public boolean isBinding(String noteId, String replName) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would isBinded() make more sense as a name for a method that checks weather a particular note is binded (bound) to a particular interpreter?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I agree with you. Thanks for comments.
I will change method name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bzz I want to ask your opinion. If I make Note#isBinding method, I remove InterpreterFactory#isBinded method. Do you agree with me?
Um.. Sorry I thinks that Keeping both methods is better.
|
👍 for having a test! Looks good to me, modulo the issue raised above. @mwkang can you take a look please? |
|
tested. LGTM |
|
I refactor method name. |
Yes, that is exactly what I meant @mwkang ! What do you think? |
|
@bzz I'm worried about that |
|
@bzz I changed StringUtils is static import. Can you check the code? |
| package org.apache.zeppelin.notebook; | ||
|
|
||
| import static org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils.*; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
static import statement is located at the end of all imports statements. Could you please move it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jongyoul Oh sorry, I move static import position.
Thanks for review.
|
Do you check the error of CI? I think it's meaningful error and it needs to be fixed. |
|
@jongyoul Sorry, I missed it. I will check. I appreciate your review. |
|
re-trigger CI |
|
I am not sure this error is related with this issue. |
|
@mwkang thank you for prompt addressing reviews! If you re-trigger CI more (close&re-open this PR) - does the same issue persists every time? |
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| public boolean isBinded(String noteId, String replName) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this can be removed now, in favor of Note.isBinded(), no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I will remove it.
I'm not sure if it persists. I will re-tigger after fix the issue. |
|
@bzz No, It does not persists every time. |
|
Ok, good to know, let me look into that |
|
This looks like an issue fixed in master 10h ago: Could you please try rebasing on latest master |
|
@bzz Thanks for your review. I rebase on to master and force push. |
|
Thank you! BTW in my experience, if in case of CI failure PR author posts the failure result from logs - that speeds us review a lot! CI fails now on Spark 1.6 Scala 2.10 and Scala 2.11 profiles with Which seems to be networking issue on Travis side 😒 Thank you @mwkang for contribution, looks great to me, merging to master if there is no further discussion. |
|
@bzz I think This PR have some trouble merging to master. |
|
@mwkang thank you for friendly ping! |
| import org.apache.zeppelin.user.AuthenticationInfo; | ||
| import org.apache.zeppelin.user.Credentials; | ||
|
|
||
| import static org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils.*; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As per project styleguide#s3.3.1-wildcard-imports - could you please replace whiledcard imports?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bzz I'm sorry. I removed wild card import.
|
Thank you for your patience @mwkang ! Will merge to master asap, right after that, if there is no further discussion! |
|
ping @bzz |
|
I'm sorry for delay, @mwkang - my plate was full last week. |
What is this PR for?
Ignore implicit interpreter when user enter wrong interpreter name
linked to #806 (comment)
This PR is related to #1113
ZEPPELIN-1069 branch was force push, so couldn't reopen that PR.
What type of PR is it?
Improvement
What is the Jira issue?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1069
How should this be tested?
Unit test
Run-time checking
Screenshots (if appropriate)
Questions: