[ZEPPELIN-707]Automatically adds %.* of previous paragraph's typing#806
[ZEPPELIN-707]Automatically adds %.* of previous paragraph's typing#806mwkang wants to merge 19 commits into
Conversation
|
Zeppelin automatically adds new paragraph when last paragraph runs. |
|
I agree with you. This commit is too hasty. |
|
@Leemoonsoo |
|
Isn't it possible not to have any front-end code for that? |
|
The purpose of this front-end code is to track the recent usage of the interpteter(by the users). |
|
Does this work when the user has not included |
|
@felixcheung e.g.) |
|
Is there anything wrong? |
|
@mwkang Great job! But as you can see - CI is failing now, you probably need to check in |
|
For me, same comment as before. |
|
@bzz Thank you for your review. |
|
@corneadoug I have a question. If User doesn't run paragraph, Always add |
|
If we create a new empty paragraph, we should add the |
|
I change my code it is use only backend. I force push my remote branch. So remove previous commit. |
|
@corneadoug |
|
I found 2 problems:
Will copy
Paragraph 1Paragraph 2The new paragraph will have |
|
@mwkang Do you have time to fix this PR? |
|
@corneadoug |
|
@corneadoug |
|
I'm so sorry. CI was failed. |
|
@mwkang no problem |
|
@corneadoug @Leemoonsoo Yeah! I passed all test. |
|
@mwkang
|
|
@corneadoug (I am so sorry I think I am a stupid. 😢) |
|
I don't remember if there was a way to change the default interpreter. In our case, if we try running You will get a: |
|
@corneadoug |
|
|
@corneadoug |
|
Since the cursor is moving in the text editor of the new paragraph, it should also go at the end of the line |
|
@jongyoul I rebase this PR onto master. I'll create new PR about It ignore wrong interpreter name |
|
@mwkang Could you please re-trigger test once again? |
|
I reopened this PR. But I think I have to fix some test case. |
|
|
Yes, those test are not relevant to you. LGTM. I'll merge it into master. |
|
Thanks for the contribution. I'm looking forward to see your next PR. |
|
Wow thanks for your patience. This PR is a long period and lots of comments. I'll keep on trying my best. |
### What is this PR for? This PR is to fix bug from #806. The default interpreter name that automatically adds should be interpreter group name. ### What type of PR is it? Bug Fix ### Screenshots (if appropriate) - before  - after  ### Questions: * Does the licenses files need update? no * Is there breaking changes for older versions? no * Does this needs documentation? no Author: astroshim <hsshim@nflabs.com> Closes #1058 from astroshim/bugfix/ZEPPELIN-707 and squashes the following commits: 8e00b49 [astroshim] default interpreter name should be group name.
…rpreter name ### What is this PR for? Ignore implicit interpreter when user enter wrong interpreter name linked to #806 (comment) This PR is related to #1113 ZEPPELIN-1069 branch was force push, so couldn't reopen that PR. ### What type of PR is it? Improvement ### What is the Jira issue? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1069 ### How should this be tested? Unit test Run-time checking ### Screenshots (if appropriate)  ### Questions: * Does the licenses files need update? no * Is there breaking changes for older versions? no * Does this needs documentation? no Author: Minwoo Kang <minwoo.kang@outlook.com> Closes #1248 from mwkang/ZEPPELIN-1069 and squashes the following commits: 3976a96 [Minwoo Kang] Remove wild card import fa7a194 [Minwoo Kang] Fix CI failed f0eedeb [Minwoo Kang] Remove unnecessary method. 6e91dfe [Minwoo Kang] Remove unnecessary method. dd60d72 [Minwoo Kang] Fixed CI 046f5f4 [Minwoo Kang] Modify static import position. 6082e28 [Minwoo Kang] Modify that StringUtils is static import 02a1c2a [Minwoo Kang] Refactor method name 4912c5c [Minwoo Kang] Add test cases b6520be [Minwoo Kang] Add function that is replName is binding.
What is this PR for?
Automatically adds %pyspark in the code area after paragraph created, if previous paragraph's typing is %pyspark.
What type of PR is it?
New Feature
What is the Jira issue?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-707
How should this be tested?
unit test
Run-time checking
Screenshots (if appropriate)