Add support for “grand” scopes

[pokey]

Eg "take grand funk" would take function containing function contains token. Could also add "great grand funk" etc.

[AndreasArvidsson]

Maybe use ordinals here?

take second funk
take third map

[pokey]

We're going to want those ordinals for the new grammar. "Take second funk" will take the second function in the class containing the cursor

[AndreasArvidsson]

Okay then use super maybe?
take super funk
take second super funk

Is just don't think that great grand is the best syntax for nested code. What if you have more levels nested? But it's ok if you don't use it like that of course. You could always find a mark closer to the scope you actually want.

[pokey]

Yeah "super" could work, tho I'm not sure it helps because "second super funk" would want to be the second "super funk" in the new grammar

But yeah I agree multiple levels of nesting will be awkward as it would be "great great grand funk". Tho not sure how common it will be to want to go up more than 2 levels ("grand funk"), so from my perspective it's more important for it to be possible than compact

Could do something like "two super"? Idk not sure that feels right

Also we can (and maybe should?) make it so "funk" applied to a function target will expand to next higher funk rather than being idempotent, so then you could do "funk funk", which also scales like the "grand" approach but might have benefits

[bra1nDump]

Came across this after discovering take state state is a totally valid command, but the second state is a noop. I would expect this to work like what is being proposed here take super [scope].

The idea reminds me of VSCode 'Expand selection' command.