Skip to content

Slurm CI implementation#57

Merged
mrocklin merged 3 commits into
dask:masterfrom
guillaumeeb:slurm_docker_ci
May 15, 2018
Merged

Slurm CI implementation#57
mrocklin merged 3 commits into
dask:masterfrom
guillaumeeb:slurm_docker_ci

Conversation

@guillaumeeb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes #42.

Tests working on laptop, we'll see with Travis.

Will need to be slightly reworked after #47 is merged.

Slurm cluster is starting well

More representative slurm nodes

Working slurm test on laptop

Fix sge remains
@guillaumeeb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Seems to be okay for SLURM. Need to wait for #54 merge for sge failures.

@jhamman

jhamman commented May 14, 2018 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@guillaumeeb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I’m personally fine with you merging your own ci prs to speed this process up

I'm good with this as long as there has been some reviews (which is the case for #47), however, I don't think I've got the rights on this repo to do it.

@guillaumeeb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I've also fixed PBS ci in the last commit, which was broken as Sge in #54.
We can do this in a separated PR if needed.

@mrocklin mrocklin merged commit 0cae4ec into dask:master May 15, 2018
@mrocklin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This looks good to me. Merging.

@guillaumeeb I've also sent out an invitation giving you write permissions to this repository. Thank you for all of your work here, this project wouldn't be nearly as far along without you.

@guillaumeeb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Thanks, it's a pleasure to contribute to the Dask/Pangeo effort.

@guillaumeeb guillaumeeb deleted the slurm_docker_ci branch August 27, 2018 11:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants