Skip to content

update libgbm package name for fedora#26

Open
Luctins wants to merge 2 commits intofree-explorers:mainfrom
Luctins:patch-1
Open

update libgbm package name for fedora#26
Luctins wants to merge 2 commits intofree-explorers:mainfrom
Luctins:patch-1

Conversation

@Luctins
Copy link

@Luctins Luctins commented Mar 4, 2025

Added missing mesa- prefix for newer versions.

@PapyElGringo any suggestions on how to make the table look nicer?

Added missing mesa- prefix for newer versions
@Luctins
Copy link
Author

Luctins commented Mar 4, 2025

(context) I'm trying to build veshell under fedora 41 and the libgbm package name seems to be outdated.

@PapyElGringo
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @Luctins ! I'm happy to see you trying Veshell now :)

Did you succeed compile? Come chat Discord

I think we can replace the old by the new mesa-

Do you think the table is ugly?

@Luctins
Copy link
Author

Luctins commented Mar 4, 2025

@PapyElGringo

I did succeed after installing the missing package, yes. If you think replacing the package name is better we can do that too, I only thought at first keeping both would be better for backwards compatibility but since this is still in a experimental stage having bleeding edge dependencies is not a problem I think (I was honestly surprised you took the time to find the package names at all).
And the table only looks kinda ugly with both the new and old package names together (It's too wide I think).
Just a curiosity, why not use a markdown table?

@PapyElGringo
Copy link
Contributor

I think it was for the colspan feature :)

@PapyElGringo
Copy link
Contributor

regarding #25 it's seems that we need to add libstdc++-12-dev for ubuntu

@PapyElGringo
Copy link
Contributor

of we also need to add libgtk-3-sdk #25 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants