Skip to content

changelog#963

Merged
martindurant merged 1 commit into
fsspec:mainfrom
martindurant:release
May 20, 2025
Merged

changelog#963
martindurant merged 1 commit into
fsspec:mainfrom
martindurant:release

Conversation

@martindurant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@martindurant
martindurant merged commit e960296 into fsspec:main May 20, 2025
@martindurant
martindurant deleted the release branch May 20, 2025 16:01
@d-v-b

d-v-b commented May 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

can you explain why the fsspec dep is fsspec==2025.5.0, rather than fsspec>=2025.5.0?

I think the == requirement makes the upstream fsspec incompatible with the upstream s3fs according to pip's solver. see https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr-python/actions/runs/15218451870/job/42826570416?pr=3087.

@martindurant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@d-v-b , see #966 ; only zarr cares about this?

For reference, distributed depends on an exact pin of dask ( https://github.com/dask/distributed/blob/main/pyproject.toml#L31 ).

@d-v-b

d-v-b commented May 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@d-v-b , see #966 ; only zarr cares about this?

For reference, distributed depends on an exact pin of dask ( https://github.com/dask/distributed/blob/main/pyproject.toml#L31 ).

Anyone who attempts to install

    'fsspec @ git+https://github.com/fsspec/filesystem_spec',
    's3fs @ git+https://github.com/fsspec/s3fs',

in the same environment with a solver that cares about a consistent set of dependencies will care about this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants