docs: use sub-issues to link Problems to Goals#98
Conversation
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Vadim <vadim@holdex.io>
… of https://github.com/holdex/developers into docs/clarify-no-duplicate-notifications-in-goal-issues
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Vadim <vadim@holdex.io>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 16 minutes and 9 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughDocumentation restructuring consolidates governance principles from a standalone PRINCIPLES.md into CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, expands CONTRIBUTING.md with detailed PR requirements and review process guidance, removes PRINCIPLES.md, adds REFERRAL.md for referral program rules, updates README links, and updates a Git submodule reference. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.claude/worktrees/practical-babbage:
- Line 1: Remove the local worktree artifact
".claude/worktrees/practical-babbage" from this PR: delete the file/dir from the
branch (or remove it from the commit), add the ".claude/" pattern to .gitignore
to prevent future inclusion, and amend or create a new commit so the change no
longer appears in the PR (the offending commit is
77a4742269171974ee5919c0376a5e894e7f27a4). Ensure the PR contains only
source/docs content and that the worktree metadata is not tracked going forward.
In `@docs/CONTRIBUTING.md`:
- Line 169: The CONTRIBUTING guidelines are inconsistent about whether the PR
title scope is required: update the two occurrences so they match by choosing
one canonical format (either require scope using `type(scope): action` or allow
optional scope using `type(scope [Optional]): action`) and then replace both
instances (the checklist item `[ ] PR title follows `type(scope): action`` and
the Naming section example `type(scope [Optional]): action`) to use the chosen
format so the rules are unambiguous.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 4a010dab-9c41-402d-b942-ec9022bd0f92
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.claude/worktrees/practical-babbageREADME.mddocs/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.mddocs/CONTRIBUTING.mddocs/PRINCIPLES.mddocs/REFERRAL.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- docs/PRINCIPLES.md
Time Submission Status
You can submit time with the command. Example: See available commands to help comply with our Guidelines. |
|
@holdex pr submit-time 1h |
Summary
Why
Using sub-issues establishes a real structural parent-child relationship — it shows up in the Goal issue's UI, tracks completion automatically, and is unambiguous. Manually adding a list-item link in the Goal description is redundant and tends to go stale.
Summary by CodeRabbit