[Python] Support encode for array of string in serialization and deserialization - #9146
Merged
Conversation
commit: |
Contributor
|
All changed packages have been documented.
Show changes
|
Collaborator
|
You can try these changes here
|
msyyc
marked this pull request as ready for review
December 11, 2025 06:52
msyyc
requested review from
catalinaperalta,
iscai-msft,
laiapat,
lmazuel,
swathipil,
tadelesh and
timotheeguerin
as code owners
December 11, 2025 06:52
14 tasks
msyyc
enabled auto-merge
December 12, 2025 05:05
tadelesh
reviewed
Dec 12, 2025
tadelesh
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can we add a unit test for the array encode for mode_base?
Contributor
Author
@tadelesh added. |
iscai-msft
approved these changes
Dec 12, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fix #9026
TCGC is ready: Azure/typespec-azure#3583
Spector case: #9106