[Tests-Only] Skip on oc v10 for special ocis preview scenarios - #37274
Merged
individual-it merged 2 commits intoApr 17, 2020
Conversation
11 tasks
Contributor
Author
|
https://drone.owncloud.com/owncloud/core/24312/64/13 |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #37274 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 64.92% 64.92%
Complexity 19151 19151
=========================================
Files 1267 1267
Lines 74902 74902
Branches 1331 1331
=========================================
Hits 48633 48633
Misses 25877 25877
Partials 392 392
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
individual-it
approved these changes
Apr 17, 2020
delete-merged-branch
Bot
deleted the
skipOnOcV10-for-special-ocis-preview-scenarios
branch
April 17, 2020 07:17
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Skip those on OcV10
apiWebdavPreviewssuite is not actually running in core CI. That is why we did not discover this problem in core! Add it to CI.How Has This Been Tested?
CI
Types of changes
Checklist: