docs: publish RHDH plugin quality requirements by support level (RHIDP-13497) - #5158
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5158 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 63.69% 59.96% -3.74%
==========================================
Files 123 111 -12
Lines 2424 2198 -226
Branches 572 523 -49
==========================================
- Hits 1544 1318 -226
- Misses 878 879 +1
+ Partials 2 1 -1
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Code Review by Qodo
Context used✅ Compliance rules (platform):
46 rules✅ Skills:
e2e-verify-fix, e2e-diagnose-and-fix✅ Cross-repo context Explored:
repo: redhat-developer/rhdh-plugins (sha: 77b7f157) Not relevant to this PR:
redhat-developer/rhdh-chart Not relevant to this PR:
redhat-developer/rhdh-operator Not relevant to this PR:
redhat-developer/rhdh-local 1. Non-portable JUnit parsing
|
PR Summary by QodoAdd cluster-free plugin sanity check and publish plugin quality requirements doc
AI Description
Diagram
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (22)
|
|
@gustavolira: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
…P-13497) Define differentiated testing requirements for RHDH plugins based on their support level (GA, Tech-Preview, Community, Dev-Preview). Key content: - Requirements matrix with coverage minimums per support level - GA workspace E2E coverage detail table (14/17 = 82%) - Quality gates, exception process, and metrics dashboard - Resolved open questions on TP enforcement, community load tests, and frontend/backend differentiation - Document governance (owner, review cadence, change process) - Recent progress section with delivered infrastructure This document is the canonical reference linked from the RHDH Plugin Ecosystem Workflow spreadsheet (row 5.0 Quality). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2759ebd to
ff8c9fe
Compare
|
abf5d11
into
redhat-developer:main



Summary
Publishes the canonical RHDH plugin quality requirements document, defining differentiated testing requirements per support level (GA, Tech-Preview, Community, Dev-Preview).
This document is referenced from the RHDH Plugin Ecosystem Workflow spreadsheet (row 5.0 — Quality) and replaces the Jira-only requirements that were difficult to find and reference.
Key content
apiconnect,dynatrace-dql,scaffolder-backend-module-regex— all upstream/3rd-party owned)Why a repo document instead of Jira?
Per stakeholder feedback: quality requirements should be stable, visible, and easily linked — not buried in Jira comments. This document is versioned, reviewable via PR, and linkable from the Plugin Ecosystem Workflow.
Data sources
rhdh-plugin-export-overlays/workspaces/*/metadata/*.yamlrhdh-pluginsworkspace directoriesTest plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code