Skip to content

[AArch64] FEAT_SVE implies FEAT_FP16#158141

Open
CrooseGit wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
CrooseGit:dev/reucru01/sve-implies-fp16
Open

[AArch64] FEAT_SVE implies FEAT_FP16#158141
CrooseGit wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
CrooseGit:dev/reucru01/sve-implies-fp16

Conversation

@CrooseGit

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 19, 2026
@rustbot

rustbot commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

r? @oli-obk

rustbot has assigned @oli-obk.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: compiler
  • compiler expanded to 73 candidates
  • Random selection from 18 candidates

@folkertdev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

r? me

@bors r+ rollup

@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Jun 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📌 Commit 85f4a5d has been approved by folkertdev

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 20, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu-distcheck failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
.iiii....ii..i.......ii..i......i......................i..i..ii......................

failures:

---- [debuginfo-gdb] tests/debuginfo/function-call.rs stdout ----
NOTE: compiletest thinks it is using GDB version 12001000
------gdb stdout------------------------------
GNU gdb (Ubuntu 12.1-0ubuntu1~22.04.2) 12.1
Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu".
Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.
Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
    <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>.

For help, type "help".
Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word".
Breakpoint 1 at 0x1b42: file tests/debuginfo/function-call.rs, line 36.
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".

Breakpoint 1, function_call::main () at tests/debuginfo/function-call.rs:36
36     zzz(); // #break

------gdb stderr------------------------------
/tmp/distcheck/distcheck-rustc-src/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/debuginfo/function-call.gdb/function-call.debugger.script:11: Error in sourced command file:
Couldn't write extended state status: Bad address.

------------------------------------------

error: gdb failed to execute
status: exit status: 1
command: PYTHONPATH="/tmp/distcheck/distcheck-rustc-src/src/etc" "/usr/bin/gdb" "-quiet" "-batch" "-nx" "-command=/tmp/distcheck/distcheck-rustc-src/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/debuginfo/function-call.gdb/function-call.debugger.script"
--- stdout -------------------------------
GNU gdb (Ubuntu 12.1-0ubuntu1~22.04.2) 12.1
Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu".
Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.
Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
    <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>.

For help, type "help".
Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word".
Breakpoint 1 at 0x1b42: file tests/debuginfo/function-call.rs, line 36.
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".

Breakpoint 1, function_call::main () at tests/debuginfo/function-call.rs:36
36     zzz(); // #break
------------------------------------------
--- stderr -------------------------------
/tmp/distcheck/distcheck-rustc-src/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/debuginfo/function-call.gdb/function-call.debugger.script:11: Error in sourced command file:
Couldn't write extended state status: Bad address.
------------------------------------------
---
Some tests failed in compiletest suite=debuginfo mode=debuginfo host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:37:35
make: *** [Makefile:49: check] Error 1
Bootstrap failed while executing `test distcheck`
Command `make check [workdir=/tmp/distcheck/distcheck-rustc-src]` failed with exit code 2
Created at: src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/test.rs:3627:5
Executed at: src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/test.rs:3633:10

--- BACKTRACE vvv
   0: <bootstrap::utils::exec::DeferredCommand>::finish_process
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/utils/exec.rs:939:17
   1: <bootstrap::utils::exec::DeferredCommand>::wait_for_output::<&bootstrap::utils::exec::ExecutionContext>
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/utils/exec.rs:831:21
   2: <bootstrap::utils::exec::ExecutionContext>::run
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/utils/exec.rs:741:45
   3: <bootstrap::utils::exec::BootstrapCommand>::run::<&bootstrap::core::builder::Builder>
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/utils/exec.rs:339:27
   4: bootstrap::core::build_steps::test::distcheck_plain_source_tarball
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/test.rs:3633:10
   5: <bootstrap::core::build_steps::test::Distcheck as bootstrap::core::builder::Step>::run
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/test.rs:3596:9
   6: <bootstrap::core::builder::Builder>::ensure::<bootstrap::core::build_steps::test::Distcheck>
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/builder/mod.rs:1596:36
   7: <bootstrap::core::build_steps::test::Distcheck as bootstrap::core::builder::Step>::make_run
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/test.rs:3579:21
   8: <bootstrap::core::builder::StepDescription>::maybe_run
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/builder/mod.rs:476:13
   9: bootstrap::core::builder::cli_paths::match_paths_to_steps_and_run
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/builder/cli_paths.rs:232:18
  10: <bootstrap::core::builder::Builder>::run_step_descriptions
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/builder/mod.rs:1139:9
  11: <bootstrap::core::builder::Builder>::execute_cli
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/core/builder/mod.rs:1118:14
  12: <bootstrap::Build>::build
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/lib.rs:803:25
  13: bootstrap::main
             at /checkout/src/bootstrap/src/bin/main.rs:130:11
  14: <fn() as core::ops::function::FnOnce<()>>::call_once
             at /rustc/0417c25868d6dfbd1c291dfeae950504faa6f790/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:250:5
  15: std::sys::backtrace::__rust_begin_short_backtrace::<fn(), ()>
             at /rustc/0417c25868d6dfbd1c291dfeae950504faa6f790/library/std/src/sys/backtrace.rs:166:18
  16: std::rt::lang_start::<()>::{closure#0}
             at /rustc/0417c25868d6dfbd1c291dfeae950504faa6f790/library/std/src/rt.rs:206:18
  17: <&dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output = i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe as core::ops::function::FnOnce<()>>::call_once
             at /rustc/0417c25868d6dfbd1c291dfeae950504faa6f790/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:287:21
  18: std::panicking::catch_unwind::do_call::<&dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output = i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe, i32>
             at /rustc/0417c25868d6dfbd1c291dfeae950504faa6f790/library/std/src/panicking.rs:581:40
  19: std::panicking::catch_unwind::<i32, &dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output = i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe>
             at /rustc/0417c25868d6dfbd1c291dfeae950504faa6f790/library/std/src/panicking.rs:544:19
  20: std::panic::catch_unwind::<&dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output = i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe, i32>
             at /rustc/0417c25868d6dfbd1c291dfeae950504faa6f790/library/std/src/panic.rs:359:14
  21: std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure#0}
             at /rustc/0417c25868d6dfbd1c291dfeae950504faa6f790/library/std/src/rt.rs:175:24
  22: std::panicking::catch_unwind::do_call::<std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure#0}, isize>
             at /rustc/0417c25868d6dfbd1c291dfeae950504faa6f790/library/std/src/panicking.rs:581:40
---
  29: __libc_start_main
  30: _start


Command has failed. Rerun with -v to see more details.
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:44:19
  local time: Sat Jun 20 12:14:48 UTC 2026
  network time: Sat, 20 Jun 2026 12:14:48 GMT
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
##[group]Run echo "disk usage:"

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 20, 2026
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Jun 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💔 Test for ef20d00 failed: CI. Failed job:

@folkertdev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks spurious

@bors retry

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 20, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 20, 2026
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Jun 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💔 Test for 76526c4 failed: CI. Failed job:

@folkertdev folkertdev left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well CI is being weird. r=me whenever it's working again.

View changes since this review

@rust-log-analyzer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
  IMAGE: tidy
##[endgroup]
    Updating crates.io index
error: failed to get `adler2` as a dependency of package `miniz_oxide v0.8.8`
    ... which satisfies dependency `miniz_oxide = "^0.8.5"` of package `flate2 v1.1.9`
    ... which satisfies dependency `flate2 = "^1.1.9"` of package `citool v0.1.0 (/home/runner/work/rust/rust/src/ci/citool)`

Caused by:
  failed to load source for dependency `adler2`

Caused by:
  unable to update registry `crates-io`

Caused by:
  download of ad/le/adler2 failed

Caused by:
  curl failed

Caused by:

@folkertdev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors retry

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 20, 2026
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2026
rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2026
…uwer

Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #158137 (Only copy visible content in clipboard in source code pages)
 - #158141 ([AArch64] FEAT_SVE implies FEAT_FP16)
 - #158177 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants