Revert "Initial work on formatting headers"#6115
Conversation
|
Perhaps we should make this version gated instead of just removing it, so we can keep developing it? |
I'd considered this as well, but I'd rather not introduce churn. Instead of reverting if you'd be up for instead preserving the original header span contents (so as to not drop comments) and/or handle the non-pending case of block style comments that fit then I'd be okay with that too
for clarity, this isn't something t-style is going to specify. generally speaking dealing with these comment scenarios is something we're going to need to determine how to handle ourselves. it's just that I think we need to actually discuss and design how we want to do this as a first step |
|
Go ahead with the revert. I will try to find time to restore it later with the functionality you described :) |
This reverts commit dd301b0.
758f5a7 to
f2c84b5
Compare
Reverts #5847
There are still some pending discussions about how formatting should be handled in the presence of headers #5847 (comment). @calebcartwright please let us know when
t-stylehas made a determination on this 🙏🏼.cc: @fee1-dead