Update release policy page - #1447
Conversation
Totktonada
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Commented below. Everything else does not contradict with my understanding of the processes.
@kyukhin Please, decide whether this outstanding situation should be handled this way (via publishing a new release out of usual timelines). Since our repositories have per-push packages, it is not necessary, maybe. However we should notify users about necessity to update and properly describe reasons. |
Maybe just notify users about the patch. I see no reason for tagging new release in the case. |
|
@veod32 Please, adjust the cited sentence accordingly. |
|
@Totktonada All review comments have been resolved. Please review once again. |
Totktonada
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the changes!
I looked over the resulting document and highlighted everything that contradits with my understanding or may be formulated better.
|
@Totktonada I've resolved all the comments. Also I restructured the content and re-wrote some of the paragraphs as we discussed. Some of the paragraphs are deleted as the contained the duplication of info. |
Totktonada
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM.
I gave several minor comments, but they are tiny and there is no need to re-review it with me.
Maybe @kyukhin want to take a glance at the final variant.
Co-authored-by: Elena Shebunyaeva <elena.shebunyaeva@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Elena Shebunyaeva <elena.shebunyaeva@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Elena Shebunyaeva <elena.shebunyaeva@gmail.com>
No description provided.