tests(graph): refactor then example and use the real stdexec customization#354
Merged
Conversation
4940963 to
4ee80ef
Compare
4ee80ef to
0025408
Compare
0025408 to
078196c
Compare
maartenarnst
reviewed
Feb 4, 2026
maartenarnst
reviewed
Feb 4, 2026
maartenarnst
reviewed
Feb 4, 2026
maartenarnst
reviewed
Feb 4, 2026
maartenarnst
reviewed
Feb 4, 2026
Signed-off-by: romintomasetti <romin.tomasetti@gmail.com>
078196c to
303d920
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm looking at the previous examples we had with the "fake stdexec customization".
It seems we're missing the node placement for the graph customization.
However, for a pure
thenorbulk, there is no way to provide it.We'll need to use @maartenarnst 's work in #347 to allow for device placement.