Skip to content

Support dual-branch releases and bump to v5 beta#1622

Merged
VaguelySerious merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
peter/main-5x-beta
Apr 6, 2026
Merged

Support dual-branch releases and bump to v5 beta#1622
VaguelySerious merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
peter/main-5x-beta

Conversation

@VaguelySerious
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Add stable to release workflow trigger branches (mirrors the change already on stable via Support dual-branch releases (stable + main) #1620)
  • Make npm dist-tag conditional: GA releases from stable get latest, pre-releases from main keep only the beta tag
  • Make GitHub release flags branch-aware: stable = latest + non-prerelease, main = prerelease + not latest
  • Add major changeset to bump workflow + @workflow/core to 5.0.0-beta.0 for the next development cycle

Context

Part of the GA release plan. The stable branch has been created from main and #1508 + #1620 merged into it. This PR makes main aware of the dual-branch setup and kicks off the 5.x beta series.

After merging, the changesets action will create a "Version Packages (Pre)" PR bumping to 5.0.0-beta.0. Merging that will publish to npm with the beta dist-tag (not latest).

Test plan

  • Verify changesets action creates a version PR with 5.0.0-beta.0 versions after merge
  • Verify the published packages get the beta dist-tag, not latest
  • Verify stable branch releases still work independently with latest tag

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious requested a review from a team as a code owner April 6, 2026 20:56
@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot Bot commented Apr 6, 2026

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 3262e51

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 26 packages
Name Type
workflow Major
@workflow/core Major
@workflow/ai Major
@workflow/astro Major
@workflow/builders Major
@workflow/cli Major
@workflow/errors Major
@workflow/nest Major
@workflow/next Major
@workflow/nitro Major
@workflow/nuxt Major
@workflow/rollup Major
@workflow/serde Major
@workflow/sveltekit Major
@workflow/swc-plugin Major
@workflow/typescript-plugin Major
@workflow/utils Major
@workflow/vite Major
@workflow/vitest Major
@workflow/web Major
@workflow/web-shared Major
@workflow/world Major
@workflow/world-local Major
@workflow/world-postgres Major
@workflow/world-testing Major
@workflow/world-vercel Major

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel Bot commented Apr 6, 2026

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 6, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.041s (+14.0% 🔺) 1.005s (~) 0.965s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.057s (-2.9%) 1.011s (~) 0.953s 10 1.41x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.060s (+1.9%) 1.009s (~) 0.949s 10 1.48x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 0.281s (-2.8%) 2.355s (+21.4% 🔺) 2.074s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 0.284s (-42.1% 🟢) 2.282s (-9.4% 🟢) 1.998s 10 1.01x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.127s (+3.0%) 2.006s (~) 0.879s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.151s (+0.5%) 2.011s (~) 0.860s 10 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.158s (+0.8%) 2.011s (~) 0.853s 10 1.03x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 1.828s (+2.4%) 3.665s (-0.5%) 1.837s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 1.927s (-2.0%) 3.715s (+1.2%) 1.788s 10 1.05x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 10.899s (~) 11.021s (~) 0.122s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 10.901s (+2.6%) 11.024s (~) 0.123s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.954s (+0.5%) 11.352s (+3.0%) 0.399s 3 1.01x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 16.765s (+3.3%) 18.736s (+2.6%) 1.971s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 17.377s (+3.5%) 19.715s (+2.9%) 2.339s 2 1.04x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 14.554s (~) 15.028s (~) 0.474s 4 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.703s (+1.1%) 15.024s (~) 0.321s 4 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 14.981s (+5.6% 🔺) 15.279s (+1.7%) 0.298s 4 1.03x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 31.543s (-0.7%) 33.433s (-0.9%) 1.890s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 34.348s (+2.6%) 36.194s (+2.2%) 1.846s 2 1.09x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 14.002s (-1.5%) 14.594s (-2.9%) 0.592s 7 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.142s (~) 15.028s (+2.9%) 0.886s 6 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 16.656s (+11.9% 🔺) 17.030s (+13.3% 🔺) 0.374s 6 1.19x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 49.959s (-1.7%) 51.878s (-0.9%) 1.919s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 53.322s (-5.9% 🟢) 55.184s (-5.7% 🟢) 1.862s 2 1.07x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.246s (-3.2%) 2.009s (~) 0.762s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.283s (+1.2%) 2.010s (~) 0.727s 15 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 1.533s (+4.7%) 2.006s (~) 0.473s 15 1.23x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.059s (-17.5% 🟢) 3.701s (-9.2% 🟢) 1.642s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.135s (+5.4% 🔺) 3.838s (-2.8%) 1.703s 8 1.04x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 2.343s (-2.0%) 3.010s (~) 0.667s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.367s (+1.7%) 3.010s (~) 0.643s 10 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 3.016s (+7.2% 🔺) 3.760s (+21.0% 🔺) 0.744s 8 1.29x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.603s (+9.7% 🔺) 4.057s (+2.8%) 1.454s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.026s (+13.2% 🔺) 4.645s (+4.3%) 1.618s 7 1.16x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.461s (-1.6%) 4.010s (~) 0.549s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.478s (~) 4.011s (~) 0.533s 8 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 8.501s (+17.5% 🔺) 9.021s (+16.1% 🔺) 0.520s 4 2.46x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 3.456s (+17.7% 🔺) 5.008s (+12.8% 🔺) 1.552s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.634s (-44.9% 🟢) 5.563s (-32.7% 🟢) 1.929s 6 1.05x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.262s (-1.3%) 2.008s (~) 0.746s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.266s (+1.3%) 2.008s (~) 0.742s 15 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 1.559s (+8.0% 🔺) 2.006s (~) 0.446s 15 1.24x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.995s (-11.2% 🟢) 3.826s (-2.2%) 1.831s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.198s (-18.1% 🟢) 3.812s (-12.6% 🟢) 1.614s 8 1.10x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 2.323s (-1.2%) 3.010s (~) 0.687s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.347s (-0.8%) 3.010s (~) 0.663s 10 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 3.007s (+9.2% 🔺) 3.676s (+22.2% 🔺) 0.668s 9 1.29x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.955s (+0.9%) 4.658s (+2.7%) 1.703s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.586s (+0.8%) 6.372s (+5.4% 🔺) 1.786s 5 1.55x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.475s (~) 4.010s (~) 0.534s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.493s (~) 4.013s (~) 0.520s 8 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 8.780s (+15.2% 🔺) 9.021s (+12.5% 🔺) 0.240s 4 2.53x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.483s (-0.6%) 5.255s (+2.1%) 1.772s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 4.785s (+58.9% 🔺) 6.518s (+35.3% 🔺) 1.732s 5 1.37x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.814s (-3.3%) 1.005s (~) 0.191s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.828s (+2.3%) 1.006s (~) 0.177s 60 1.02x
💻 Local Nitro 0.980s (+40.5% 🔺) 1.096s (+9.1% 🔺) 0.116s 55 1.20x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 9.643s (-0.8%) 11.376s (-1.7%) 1.733s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 10.158s (+15.3% 🔺) 12.288s (+17.0% 🔺) 2.130s 5 1.05x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.931s (-3.8%) 2.075s (-19.6% 🟢) 0.144s 44 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.024s (+5.6% 🔺) 2.609s (+25.7% 🔺) 0.585s 35 1.05x
💻 Local Nitro 3.017s (+34.3% 🔺) 3.586s (+19.2% 🔺) 0.569s 26 1.56x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 26.432s (~) 28.154s (-0.8%) 1.722s 4 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 30.634s (+4.6%) 32.807s (+4.8%) 2.173s 3 1.16x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.929s (-2.5%) 4.180s (-7.7% 🟢) 0.251s 29 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 4.189s (+7.6% 🔺) 5.011s (+24.0% 🔺) 0.822s 24 1.07x
💻 Local Nitro 9.246s (+26.4% 🔺) 9.941s (+24.0% 🔺) 0.695s 13 2.35x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 69.412s (-6.3% 🟢) 71.352s (-6.6% 🟢) 1.940s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 76.308s (+1.1%) 78.144s (+1.4%) 1.836s 2 1.10x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.275s (-2.5%) 1.007s (~) 0.731s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.286s (+2.2%) 1.007s (~) 0.721s 60 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 0.585s (+1.0%) 1.004s (~) 0.419s 60 2.12x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.605s (+11.6% 🔺) 3.358s (+11.3% 🔺) 1.753s 18 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 1.612s (+24.2% 🔺) 3.172s (+9.8% 🔺) 1.560s 20 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.490s (-2.8%) 1.007s (~) 0.517s 90 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.509s (+4.6%) 1.018s (+1.1%) 0.509s 89 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 2.556s (+3.8%) 3.010s (~) 0.453s 30 5.22x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.468s (-0.6%) 4.296s (+4.6%) 1.828s 21 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.332s (+5.4% 🔺) 5.157s (+7.9% 🔺) 1.825s 18 1.35x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.780s (-4.8%) 1.007s (~) 0.227s 120 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.806s (+4.2%) 1.017s (+1.0%) 0.211s 119 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 11.408s (+9.0% 🔺) 12.029s (+9.1% 🔺) 0.621s 10 14.62x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 6.178s (-8.0% 🟢) 8.067s (-6.8% 🟢) 1.889s 15 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 7.234s (+1.4%) 9.251s (+5.6% 🔺) 2.018s 13 1.17x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.202s (+40.9% 🔺) 1.004s (~) 0.012s (+25.5% 🔺) 1.018s (~) 0.816s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.203s (-15.4% 🟢) 0.995s (~) 0.001s (-95.6% 🟢) 1.011s (-2.9%) 0.809s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.228s (+11.2% 🔺) 0.995s (~) 0.002s (+46.2% 🔺) 1.013s (~) 0.785s 10 1.13x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.440s (-6.1% 🟢) 2.658s (-5.0% 🟢) 0.675s (+8.7% 🔺) 3.762s (-3.2%) 2.322s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 1.464s (+3.4%) 2.549s (+2.4%) 0.746s (+2.0%) 3.758s (+2.6%) 2.294s 10 1.02x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.604s (-3.6%) 1.003s (~) 0.004s (+7.1% 🔺) 1.022s (~) 0.419s 59 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.609s (~) 1.003s (~) 0.004s (+1.8%) 1.022s (~) 0.413s 59 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 1.076s (+62.4% 🔺) 1.011s (~) 0.010s (+3.1%) 1.364s (+22.4% 🔺) 0.288s 44 1.78x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 4.019s (+6.1% 🔺) 5.451s (+6.3% 🔺) 0.390s (+39.6% 🔺) 6.262s (+7.6% 🔺) 2.243s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.070s (-22.1% 🟢) 5.535s (-18.4% 🟢) 0.528s (+81.5% 🔺) 6.540s (-13.8% 🟢) 2.469s 10 1.01x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.933s (-2.0%) 1.144s (~) 0.000s (+96.2% 🔺) 1.161s (~) 0.229s 53 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.964s (+1.9%) 1.272s (+13.3% 🔺) 0.000s (+14.9% 🔺) 1.286s (+13.0% 🔺) 0.322s 47 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 1.217s (+3.8%) 2.018s (~) 0.000s (~) 2.020s (~) 0.803s 30 1.30x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.665s (~) 3.789s (-3.7%) 0.000s (-95.9% 🟢) 4.193s (-4.7%) 1.529s 15 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.035s (-5.8% 🟢) 4.676s (+4.7%) 0.000s (~) 5.106s (+0.8%) 2.070s 12 1.14x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.746s (-3.8%) 2.066s (-7.1% 🟢) 0.000s (-6.9% 🟢) 2.095s (-6.2% 🟢) 0.348s 29 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.810s (+2.1%) 2.102s (-1.7%) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 2.116s (-1.7%) 0.306s 29 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 3.578s (+3.8%) 4.164s (+3.4%) 0.001s (+28.6% 🔺) 4.167s (+3.3%) 0.589s 15 2.05x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 3.505s (-9.2% 🟢) 4.827s (-9.4% 🟢) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 5.257s (-8.5% 🟢) 1.752s 12 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.276s (+4.3%) 5.646s (+5.3% 🔺) 0.000s (-81.7% 🟢) 6.121s (+5.7% 🔺) 1.845s 10 1.22x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Nitro 21/21
🐘 Postgres Nitro 18/21
▲ Vercel Express 15/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 20/21
Next.js (Turbopack) ▲ Vercel 21/21
Nitro 🐘 Postgres 18/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: cancelled
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 6, 2026

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
❌ ▲ Vercel Production 878 1 67 946
✅ 💻 Local Development 854 0 178 1032
✅ 📦 Local Production 854 0 178 1032
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 854 0 178 1032
✅ 🪟 Windows 78 0 8 86
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds 134 64 24 222
✅ 📋 Other 216 0 42 258
Total 3868 65 675 4608

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

astro (1 failed):

  • DurableAgent e2e core tool error recovery
🌍 Community Worlds (64 failed)

mongodb (4 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNJ9MH2YJEB32SGBZN6499YZ
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9MSVXXHN57444TP664BJ6
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNJ9WM1MX5VKVYAB11EX8HY6
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNJA2ZP4QPK1G6HQFK86M92S

redis (3 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNJ9MH2YJEB32SGBZN6499YZ
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNJ9WM1MX5VKVYAB11EX8HY6
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNJA2ZP4QPK1G6HQFK86M92S

turso (57 failed):

  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9KATV5QMM2FM203H0T1SH
  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9KATV5QMM2FM203H0T1SH
  • wellKnownAgentWorkflow (.well-known/agent) | wrun_01KNJ9MMPTXCTRFNGJ7DDJ0V4Z
  • should work with react rendering in step
  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9KHZGKKXD9MGEB4QNN31F
  • promiseRaceWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9KPDGE070TT5TJK8NPPEJ
  • promiseAnyWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9KSCCYE3ZRDGA6RATG45K
  • importedStepOnlyWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9MZVKQ4NN7B763PKWAPHN
  • hookWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9M5CGZHM2VA45ARKHE68T
  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNJ9MH2YJEB32SGBZN6499YZ
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9MSVXXHN57444TP664BJ6
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9N094G03YFCB77TWJAHQ2
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9NDKPKE7ZV97AH9VY6KDB
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9NJ0CQG0ZEPF0DPT2APKB
  • workflowAndStepMetadataWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9NM2JVX9H3XR3EQKHCF4N
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9RA1DJWM9R22QA43JTXDK
  • promiseRaceStressTestWorkflow | wrun_01KNJ9RDG0BM370DWV8NX7V9VF
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors nested function calls preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors cross-file imports preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors basic step error preserves message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors cross-file step error preserves message and function names in stack
  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success
  • error handling retry behavior FatalError fails immediately without retries
  • error handling retry behavior RetryableError respects custom retryAfter delay
  • error handling retry behavior maxRetries=0 disables retries
  • error handling catchability FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is()
  • error handling not registered WorkflowNotRegisteredError fails the run when workflow does not exist
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the step but workflow can catch it
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the run when not caught in workflow
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion | wrun_01KNJ9VZGX3FDF5BGX43S9WWRQ
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNJ9WM1MX5VKVYAB11EX8HY6
  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running | wrun_01KNJ9XAHST0KC4PEPGNT1H4V0
  • stepFunctionPassingWorkflow - step function references can be passed as arguments (without closure vars) | wrun_01KNJ9XYGEY51SGSVA2YBVGQND
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument | wrun_01KNJ9Y7X5D3Q2SX5KNGXWZR6H
  • closureVariableWorkflow - nested step functions with closure variables | wrun_01KNJ9YDQRC5WB9B9PFMEDH0FZ
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step | wrun_01KNJ9YFWCA4KNXY3MMXHYBJK1
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • pathsAliasWorkflow - TypeScript path aliases resolve correctly | wrun_01KNJ9Z04JSHH5D06NES1YK4ZE
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class | wrun_01KNJ9Z5ZM12DYGCFV0SPH74YJ
  • AllInOneService.processNumber - static workflow method using sibling static step methods | wrun_01KNJ9ZCMGNSQ2N0X43SJYSZQR
  • ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class | wrun_01KNJ9ZJRNEZE1XPSDXSZE0JD0
  • thisSerializationWorkflow - step function invoked with .call() and .apply() | wrun_01KNJ9ZSQQT7CXS7948TSVF547
  • customSerializationWorkflow - custom class serialization with WORKFLOW_SERIALIZE/WORKFLOW_DESERIALIZE | wrun_01KNJA00D7DRKCGDFV9713382C
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive | wrun_01KNJA073B35H4WRHQE5GR1T6N
  • crossContextSerdeWorkflow - classes defined in step code are deserializable in workflow context | wrun_01KNJA0HC5NEC6FD6M9CBPD7WH
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument | wrun_01KNJA0S7TBZ5Y2XVD1R9HMBH1
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KNJA109NKRPRE74AAFF1G6F0
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KNJA19KC4F5VCVH53GYXN5FV
  • pages router addTenWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router promiseAllWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router sleepingWorkflow via pages router
  • hookWithSleepWorkflow - hook payloads delivered correctly with concurrent sleep | wrun_01KNJA1NNYBS28G7DC4ZEB2VBM
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_01KNJA2AB74MCECJ9NG4JMFAZS
  • sleepWithSequentialStepsWorkflow - sequential steps work with concurrent sleep (control) | wrun_01KNJA2MHFXVT0REW58T8A8NPG
  • importMetaUrlWorkflow - import.meta.url is available in step bundles | wrun_01KNJA2VCHYBJT3VSZ7NEMG1NH
  • metadataFromHelperWorkflow - getWorkflowMetadata/getStepMetadata work from module-level helper (#1577) | wrun_01KNJA2XH9NYGXPYTQXQVAVYAA
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNJA2ZP4QPK1G6HQFK86M92S

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
❌ astro 78 1 7
✅ example 79 0 7
✅ express 79 0 7
✅ fastify 79 0 7
✅ hono 79 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack 84 0 2
✅ nextjs-webpack 84 0 2
✅ nitro 79 0 7
✅ nuxt 79 0 7
✅ sveltekit 79 0 7
✅ vite 79 0 7
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 72 0 14
✅ express-stable 72 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 72 0 14
✅ hono-stable 72 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 61 0 25
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 78 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 61 0 25
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 78 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 72 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 72 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 72 0 14
✅ vite-stable 72 0 14
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 72 0 14
✅ express-stable 72 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 72 0 14
✅ hono-stable 72 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 61 0 25
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 78 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 61 0 25
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 78 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 72 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 72 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 72 0 14
✅ vite-stable 72 0 14
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 72 0 14
✅ express-stable 72 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 72 0 14
✅ hono-stable 72 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 61 0 25
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 78 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 61 0 25
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 78 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 72 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 72 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 72 0 14
✅ vite-stable 72 0 14
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 78 0 8
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ mongodb-dev 5 0 0
❌ mongodb 57 4 8
✅ redis-dev 5 0 0
❌ redis 58 3 8
✅ turso-dev 5 0 0
❌ turso 4 57 8
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 72 0 14
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 72 0 14
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 72 0 14

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

- Add `stable` to release workflow trigger branches
- Make npm dist-tag conditional: `stable` gets `latest`, `main` keeps `beta`
- Make GitHub release flags branch-aware: stable = latest, main = prerelease
- Add major changeset to bump workflow + @workflow/core to 5.0.0-beta.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Wielander <mittgfu@gmail.com>
Comment thread .changeset/bump-to-v5.md Outdated
Signed-off-by: Peter Wielander <mittgfu@gmail.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@karthikscale3 karthikscale3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious merged commit 38ee590 into main Apr 6, 2026
99 of 103 checks passed
@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious deleted the peter/main-5x-beta branch April 6, 2026 21:22
@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Apr 6, 2026
VaguelySerious added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2026
VaguelySerious added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants