[Backport] Multiple devstack releases with one machine - #7
Merged
ztraboo merged 7 commits intoOct 26, 2021
Conversation
…ers for multi-version devstack support https://discuss.openedx.org/t/docker-devstack-multiple-releases-one-machine/1902 Multiple devstack releases with one machine. This is in regards to this pull request openedx-unsupported#532 Updating volumes for `themes` to work with the `ironwood` release. Applying these changes to get local devstack working for ironwood release. openedx-unsupported#376 openedx-unsupported#377 Moved `COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME` update to `options.mk` file. Additional changes to get `devstack_docker` for Ironwood working multisite environment setup. Additional changes needed to make `docker` commands work making use of the `dev.print-container.%` target to get the container id. Reverting some of these commands back to `docker` type to align with what we did with 59f812e
…le isolated devstacks for same host. Make additional adjustments to the documentation for multiple releases one machine.
…commands for services outside of `docker-compose.yml`. Makes sure that other services (e.g. `xqueue`, etc) that are not defined in the docker-compose.yml file have the correct configuration passed to the `docker-compose exec` command to work properly.
…s one machine (regisb review). Comments came from `master` edx/devstack@c0b482d Fix issue with `docker-compose config` not outputting configuration information when `$(DOCKER_COMPOSE_FILES)` was excluded from the command. It appears that leaving out `$(DOCKER_COMPOSE_FILES)` caused the `docker-compose config` to not include the **volume** information for services within the `docker-compose.yml` file, as well as, excluding additional services like `docker-compose-{analytics-pipeline,watchers}.yml` to name a few. Update provision-ecommerce.sh with recommended changes from @morenol Co-authored-by: morenol <13-10934@usb.ve> Merging additional updates based on openedx-unsupported#569 changes for the `readme` file. - All changes from https://github.com/edx/devstack/pull/569 changes from this.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reference https://github.com/edx/devstack/pull/564 for Juniper.