Skip to content

[Stable-10] Send requests in loop rather than scenario outline to speed up CI#35472

Closed
bhawanaprasain wants to merge 1 commit into
owncloud:stable10from
bhawanaprasain:stable10-runtimeminimizer
Closed

[Stable-10] Send requests in loop rather than scenario outline to speed up CI#35472
bhawanaprasain wants to merge 1 commit into
owncloud:stable10from
bhawanaprasain:stable10-runtimeminimizer

Conversation

@bhawanaprasain

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport on: #35395

Description

These tests speedup CI .

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Database schema changes (next release will require increase of minor version instead of patch)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

@phil-davis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bhawanaprasain there are more lines deleted from tests/acceptance/features/apiAuthOcs/ocsGETAuth.feature than happened in core master

I think this feature had some differences in stable10

Can you explain what happened?

@bhawanaprasain bhawanaprasain changed the title [Stable-10] Test for speeding up CI [Stable-10] Send requests in loop rather than scenario outline to speed up CI Jun 17, 2019
@bhawanaprasain

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@phil-davis I have found no differences in this backport and PR #35395 .

@individual-it

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

the problem is in #34645 🙈

@individual-it

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

should be fine after #35548 maybe a rebase will be needed

@phil-davis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bhawanaprasain please rebase and resolve the conflict. (or make a new backport branch and PR)
This should work better now that #35548 has been merged to stable10

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants