Skip to content

Use app.restApiRoot, emit "start" event, simplify loopback-explorer integration [DO NOT MERGE YET] - #35

Closed
bajtos wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
feature/use-restApiRoot-and-emit-start-event
Closed

Use app.restApiRoot, emit "start" event, simplify loopback-explorer integration [DO NOT MERGE YET]#35
bajtos wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
feature/use-restApiRoot-and-emit-start-event

Conversation

@bajtos

@bajtos bajtos commented Jan 7, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Depends on strongloop/loopback#123.
Requires strongloop/loopback-component-explorer#9.

We need to bump up the loopback version in templates/package.js before merging the patch.

/to: @ritch please review
/cc: @sam-github

@slnode

slnode commented Jan 7, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test FAILed. To trigger a build add comment - ".test\W+please"
Refer to this link for build results: http://ci.strongloop.com/job/loopback-workspace/224/

@ritch

ritch commented Jan 7, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

@rmg

rmg commented Jan 7, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

FYI, our CI would be able to build these cross-repo changes together if the repos all used the same branch name.

Miroslav Bajtoš added 3 commits January 8, 2014 09:01
When loopback-explorer is not installed, the info message is printed
directly form the `catch` block.

When loopback-explorer was found, we let the module handle any logging
via the "start" event.
@slnode

slnode commented Jan 8, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test PASSed. To trigger a build add comment - ".test\W+please"
Refer to this link for build results: http://ci.strongloop.com/job/loopback-workspace/234/

@bajtos

bajtos commented Jan 8, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Closing in favour of #36.

The logging at start turned out to be more complex than I initially thought, I will address it in a standalone PR.

@bajtos bajtos closed this Jan 8, 2014
@bajtos
bajtos deleted the feature/use-restApiRoot-and-emit-start-event branch January 8, 2014 14:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants