chore!: Correct public inputs propagation in the tube#15547
Merged
Conversation
notnotraju
approved these changes
Jul 7, 2025
github-merge-queue Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2025
See [merge-train-readme.md](https://github.com/AztecProtocol/aztec-packages/blob/next/.github/workflows/merge-train-readme.md). BEGIN_COMMIT_OVERRIDE chore: stdlib bool internal audit (#15070) feat: improve Shplonk api (#15422) fix(merge-train): don't queue merge if merge-train failed queue, pass on rebase logic (#15508) chore: nuke bit array (#15522) chore: remove template parameters (#15530) chore: no PK (#15386) chore!: Correct public inputs propagation in the tube (#15547) chore: use `batch_invert` in native IPA verifier (#15557) chore: Move `stdlib::uint_plookup` to `stdlib::uint` (#15460) chore: use const ref commitment keys (#15584) fix: hiding circuit vk computed only once (#15589) feat: transcript can hash objects independently (#15510) chore: readme for benchmarking remotely (#15512) chore: fix avm test (#15592) chore: hash more stuff for IPA. (#15519) chore: fix avm build in merge-train/bb (#15594) feat!: structured public inputs via kernel io (#15383) fix!: aggregate correct nested pairing points in the hiding circuit (#15598) fix: bb merge-train conflicts (#15617) chore: Refactor shplonk verifier api (#15618) chore!: databus consistency checks in the hiding circuit (#15599) feat!: VK hash consistency check (#15591) END_COMMIT_OVERRIDE --------- Co-authored-by: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: sergei iakovenko <105737703+iakovenkos@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: federicobarbacovi <171914500+federicobarbacovi@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Suyash Bagad <suyash@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Jonathan Hao <jonathan@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: ledwards2225 <98505400+ledwards2225@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Raju Krishnamoorthy <krishnamoorthy@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: notnotraju <raju@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Xia <lucasxia01@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Khashayar Barooti <khashayar@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Jean M <132435771+jeanmon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Alex Gherghisan <alexghr@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Santiago Palladino <spalladino@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Santiago Palladino <santiago@aztec-labs.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The tube propagates the public inputs of the hiding circuit (received in the CIVC proof) via its own public inputs. Previously, those public inputs were being extracted from the native proof meaning they were disconnected from those used by the CIVC recursive verifier. A previous PR made the CIVC rec verifier take a stdlib proof so it is now easy to directly set the pub inputs of the stdlib proof public, making the connection proper.
Partially (entirely?) addresses AztecProtocol/barretenberg#1048